Affiliation:
1. Center for Human Nutrition, Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
2. The JiVitA Project of Johns Hopkins University, Bangladesh, Gaibandha, Bangladesh
3. Institute of Nutrition, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Background
Antenatal multiple micronutrient (MM) supplementation improves birth outcomes relative to iron–folic acid (IFA) in developing countries, but limited data exist on its impact on pregnancy micronutrient status.
Objective
We assessed the efficacy of a daily MM (15 nutrients) compared with IFA supplement, each providing approximately 1 RDA of nutrients and given beginning at pregnancy ascertainment, on late pregnancy micronutrient status of women in rural Bangladesh. Secondarily, we explored other contributors to pregnancy micronutrient status.
Methods
Within a double-masked trial (JiVitA-3) among 44,500 pregnant women, micronutrient status indicators were assessed in n = 1526 women, allocated by cluster to receive daily MM (n = 749) or IFA (n = 777), at 10 wk (baseline: before supplementation) and 32 wk (during supplementation) gestation. Efficacy of MM supplementation on micronutrient status indicators at 32 wk was assessed, controlling for baseline status and other covariates (e.g., inflammation and season), in regression models.
Results
Baseline status was comparable by intervention. Prevalence of deficiency among all participants was as follows: anemia, 20.6%; iron by ferritin, 4.0%; iron by transferrin receptor, 4.7%; folate, 2.5%; vitamin B-12, 35.4%; vitamin A, 6.7%; vitamin E, 57.7%; vitamin D, 64.0%; zinc, 13.4%; and iodine, 2.6%. At 32 wk gestation, vitamin B-12, A, and D and zinc status indicators were 3.7–13.7% higher, and ferritin, γ-tocopherol, and thyroglobulin indicators were 8.7–16.6% lower, for the MM group compared with the IFA group, with a 15–38% lower prevalence of deficiencies of vitamins B-12, A, and D and zinc (all P < 0.05). However, indicators typically suggested worsening status during pregnancy, even with supplementation, and baseline status or other covariates were more strongly associated with late pregnancy indicators than was MM supplementation.
Conclusions
Rural Bangladeshi women commonly entered pregnancy deficient in micronutrients other than iron and folic acid. Supplementation with MM improved micronutrient status, although deficiencies persisted. Preconception supplementation or higher nutrient doses may be warranted to support nutritional demands of pregnancy in undernourished populations. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00860470.
Funder
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Nutrition and Dietetics,Medicine (miscellaneous)
Reference59 articles.
1. Micronutrient deficiencies in pregnancy worldwide: health effects and prevention;Gernand;Nat Rev Endocrinol.,2016
2. Effect of maternal multiple micronutrient vs iron–folic acid supplementation on infant mortality and adverse birth outcomes in rural Bangladesh: the JiVitA-3 randomized trial;West;JAMA.,2014
3. Multiple-micronutrient supplementation for women during pregnancy;Haider;Cochrane Database Syst Rev.,2017
4. Composition of a multi-micronutrient supplement to be used in pilot programmes among pregnant women in developing countries: report of a United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), World Health Organization (WHO) and United Nations University Workshop;UNICEF,1999
5. Dietary intakes of women during pregnancy in low- and middle-income countries;Lee;Public Health Nutr.,2013