Antenatal Multiple Micronutrient Supplementation Compared to Iron–Folic Acid Affects Micronutrient Status but Does Not Eliminate Deficiencies in a Randomized Controlled Trial Among Pregnant Women of Rural Bangladesh

Author:

Schulze Kerry J1,Mehra Sucheta1,Shaikh Saijuddin2,Ali Hasmot2ORCID,Shamim Abu Ahmed2,Wu Lee S-F1,Mitra Maithilee1,Arguello Margia A1,Kmush Brittany1ORCID,Sungpuag Pongtorn3,Udomkesmelee Emorn3,Merrill Rebecca1ORCID,Klemm Rolf D W1ORCID,Ullah Barkat2,Labrique Alain B1,West Keith P1,Christian Parul1

Affiliation:

1. Center for Human Nutrition, Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD

2. The JiVitA Project of Johns Hopkins University, Bangladesh, Gaibandha, Bangladesh

3. Institute of Nutrition, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Antenatal multiple micronutrient (MM) supplementation improves birth outcomes relative to iron–folic acid (IFA) in developing countries, but limited data exist on its impact on pregnancy micronutrient status. Objective We assessed the efficacy of a daily MM (15 nutrients) compared with IFA supplement, each providing approximately 1 RDA of nutrients and given beginning at pregnancy ascertainment, on late pregnancy micronutrient status of women in rural Bangladesh. Secondarily, we explored other contributors to pregnancy micronutrient status. Methods Within a double-masked trial (JiVitA-3) among 44,500 pregnant women, micronutrient status indicators were assessed in n = 1526 women, allocated by cluster to receive daily MM (n = 749) or IFA (n = 777), at 10 wk (baseline: before supplementation) and 32 wk (during supplementation) gestation. Efficacy of MM supplementation on micronutrient status indicators at 32 wk was assessed, controlling for baseline status and other covariates (e.g., inflammation and season), in regression models. Results Baseline status was comparable by intervention. Prevalence of deficiency among all participants was as follows: anemia, 20.6%; iron by ferritin, 4.0%; iron by transferrin receptor, 4.7%; folate, 2.5%; vitamin B-12, 35.4%; vitamin A, 6.7%; vitamin E, 57.7%; vitamin D, 64.0%; zinc, 13.4%; and iodine, 2.6%. At 32 wk gestation, vitamin B-12, A, and D and zinc status indicators were 3.7–13.7% higher, and ferritin, γ-tocopherol, and thyroglobulin indicators were 8.7–16.6% lower, for the MM group compared with the IFA group, with a 15–38% lower prevalence of deficiencies of vitamins B-12, A, and D and zinc (all P < 0.05). However, indicators typically suggested worsening status during pregnancy, even with supplementation, and baseline status or other covariates were more strongly associated with late pregnancy indicators than was MM supplementation. Conclusions Rural Bangladeshi women commonly entered pregnancy deficient in micronutrients other than iron and folic acid. Supplementation with MM improved micronutrient status, although deficiencies persisted. Preconception supplementation or higher nutrient doses may be warranted to support nutritional demands of pregnancy in undernourished populations. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00860470.

Funder

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Nutrition and Dietetics,Medicine (miscellaneous)

Reference59 articles.

1. Micronutrient deficiencies in pregnancy worldwide: health effects and prevention;Gernand;Nat Rev Endocrinol.,2016

2. Effect of maternal multiple micronutrient vs iron–folic acid supplementation on infant mortality and adverse birth outcomes in rural Bangladesh: the JiVitA-3 randomized trial;West;JAMA.,2014

3. Multiple-micronutrient supplementation for women during pregnancy;Haider;Cochrane Database Syst Rev.,2017

4. Composition of a multi-micronutrient supplement to be used in pilot programmes among pregnant women in developing countries: report of a United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), World Health Organization (WHO) and United Nations University Workshop;UNICEF,1999

5. Dietary intakes of women during pregnancy in low- and middle-income countries;Lee;Public Health Nutr.,2013

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3