Development and Validation of the Negative Symptom Inventory-Psychosis Risk

Author:

Strauss Gregory P1,Walker Elaine F2ORCID,Pelletier-Baldelli Andrea3ORCID,Carter Nathan T4,Ellman Lauren M5,Schiffman Jason6,Luther Lauren1,James Sydney H1,Berglund Alysia M1,Gupta Tina7,Ristanovic Ivanka7,Mittal Vijay A7ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology, University of Georgia , Athens, GA , USA

2. Department of Psychology, Emory University , Atlanta, GA , USA

3. Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina , Chapel Hill, NC , USA

4. Department of Psychology, Michigan State University , East Lansing, MI , USA

5. Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Temple University , Philadelphia, PA , USA

6. Department of Psychological Science, University of California- Irvine , Irvine, CA , USA

7. Department of Psychology, Northwestern University , Evanston, IL , USA

Abstract

Abstract Background and Hypotheses Early identification and prevention of psychosis is limited by the availability of tools designed to assess negative symptoms in those at clinical high-risk for psychosis (CHR). To address this critical need, a multi-site study was established to develop and validate a clinical rating scale designed specifically for individuals at CHR: The Negative Symptom Inventory-Psychosis Risk (NSI-PR). Study Design The measure was developed according to guidelines recommended by the NIMH Consensus Conference on Negative Symptoms using a transparent, iterative, and data-driven process. A 16-item version of the NSI-PR was designed to have an overly inclusive set of items and lengthier interview to support the ultimate intention of creating a new briefer measure. Psychometric properties of the 16-item NSI-PR were evaluated in a sample of 218 CHR participants. Study Results Item-level analyses indicated that men had higher scores than women. Reliability analyses supported internal consistency, inter-rater agreement, and temporal stability. Associations with measures of negative symptoms and functioning supported convergent validity. Small correlations with positive, disorganized, and general symptoms supported discriminant validity. Structural analyses indicated a 5-factor structure (anhedonia, avolition, asociality, alogia, and blunted affect). Item response theory identified items for removal and indicated that the anchor range could be reduced. Factor loadings, item-level correlations, item-total correlations, and skew further supported removal of certain items. Conclusions These findings support the psychometric properties of the NSI-PR and guided the creation of a new 11-item NSI-PR that will be validated in the next phase of this multi-site scale development project.

Funder

Drs Strauss and Mittal

Mittal

Ellman

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3