Treatments of Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia: Meta-Analysis of 168 Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trials

Author:

Fusar-Poli Paolo12,Papanastasiou Evangelos1,Stahl Daniel3,Rocchetti Matteo14,Carpenter William5,Shergill Sukhwinder1,McGuire Philip12

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience King’s College London, London, UK

2. OASIS team, South London and the Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

3. Department of Biostatistics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience King’s College London, London, UK

4. Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy

5. Department of Psychiatry and Pharmacology, Maryland Psychiatric Research Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Existing treatments for schizophrenia can improve positive symptoms, but it is unclear if they have any impact on negative symptoms. This meta-analysis was conducted to assess the efficacy of available treatments for negative symptoms in schizophrenia. Methods All randomized-controlled trials of interventions for negative symptoms in schizophrenia until December 2013 were retrieved; 168 unique and independent placebo-controlled trials were used. Negative symptom scores at baseline and follow-up, duration of illness, doses of medication, type of interventions, and sample demographics were extracted. Heterogeneity was addressed with the I2 and Q statistic. Standardized mean difference in values of the Negative Symptom Rating Scale used in each study was calculated as the main outcome measure. Results 6503 patients in the treatment arm and 5815 patients in the placebo arm were included. No evidence of publication biases found. Most treatments reduced negative symptoms at follow-up relative to placebo: second-generation antipsychotics: −0.579 (−0.755 to −0.404); antidepressants: −0.349 (−0.551 to −0.146); combinations of pharmacological agents: −0.518 (−0.757 to −0.279); glutamatergic medications: −0.289 (−0.478 to −0.1); psychological interventions: −0.396 (−0.563 to −0.229). No significant effect was found for first-generation antipsychotics: −0.531 (−1.104 to 0.041) and brain stimulation: −0.228 (−0.775 to 0.319). Effects of most treatments were not clinically meaningful as measured on Clinical Global Impression Severity Scale. Conclusions and Relevance Although some statistically significant effects on negative symptoms were evident, none reached the threshold for clinically significant improvement.

Funder

Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London

National Institute for Health Research

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health

Reference55 articles.

1. Domains of psychopathology: an approach to the reduction of heterogeneity in schizophrenia;Buchanan;J Nerv Ment Dis,1994

2. Domains of psychopathology relevant to the study of etiology and treatment of schizophrenia;Carpenter,1989

3. Part III. Speculations on the processes that underlie schizophrenic symptoms and signs;Strauss;Schizophr Bull,1974

4. Lecture III, Dementia Praecox;Kraepelin,1917

5. The structure of negative symptoms within schizophrenia: implications for assessment;Blanchard;Schizophr Bull,2006

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3