Affiliation:
1. Stanford Graduate School of Business & NBER & CEPR
2. Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania & NBER & CEPR
Abstract
Abstract
How does the shadow banking system respond to changes in capital regulation of commercial banks? We propose a quantitative general equilibrium model with regulated and unregulated banks to study the unintended consequences of regulation. Tighter capital requirements for regulated banks cause higher convenience yield on debt of all banks, leading to higher shadow bank leverage and a larger shadow banking sector. At the same time, tighter regulation eliminates the subsidies to commercial banks from deposit insurance, reducing the competitive pressures on shadow banks to take risks. The net effect is a safer financial system with more shadow banking. Calibrating the model to data on financial institutions in the US, the optimal capital requirement is around 16$\%$.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics
Reference80 articles.
1. Securitization Without Risk Transfer;Acharya,;Journal of Financial Economics,2013
2. Fallacies and Irrelevant Facts in the Discussion on Capital Regulation;Admati,;Central Banking at a Crossroads: Europe and Beyond, London,2014
3. Shadow Banking: A Review of the Literature;Adrian,,2016
4. Liquidity and Leverage;Adrian,;Journal of Financial Intermediation,2010
5. Deposits and Bank Capital Structure;Allen,;Journal of Financial Economics,2015
Cited by
57 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献