Author:
MORENO DIEGO,TAKALO TUOMAS
Abstract
AbstractConsider a bank which chooses an asset portfolio and then, upon the public disclosure of the results of a review of its quality, raises funds by offering a repayment promise. We show that increasing the precision of information about the quality of the bank's assets lowers the cost of funding of a sound bank and encourages it to take risk. Maximum stability is reached in an opaque environment. Maximum surplus is reached in an opaque (transparent) environment when the social costs of bank failure are large (small). We examine how these conclusions change under alternative information and contractual conditions.
Reference44 articles.
1. Acharya Viral DenizAnginer andJosephWarburton. (2022) “The End of Market Discipline? Investor Expectations of Implicit Government Guarantees.” CEPR Discussion Papers No. 17426.
2. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (2018) “Pillar 3 Disclosure Requirements ‐ Updated Framework.” Bank for International Settlements.
3. Financial Regulation in a Quantitative Model of the Modern Banking System;Begenau Juliane;Review of Economic Studies,2022
4. Transparency in the Financial System: Rollover Risk and Crises;Bouvard Matthieu;Journal of Finance,2015