Affiliation:
1. Michigan State University
2. Harvard University
3. Harvard Business School
Abstract
AbstractFixed differences loom smaller when compared to large differences. We propose a model of relative thinking where a person weighs a given change along a consumption dimension by less when it is compared to bigger changes along that dimension. In deterministic settings, the model predicts context effects such as the attraction effect but predicts meaningful bounds on such effects driven by the intrinsic utility for the choices. In risky environments, a person is less likely to sacrifice utility on one dimension to gain utility on another that is made riskier. For example, a person is less likely to exert effort for a fixed monetary return if there is greater overall income uncertainty. We design and run experiments to test basic model predictions and find support for these predictions.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics
Reference83 articles.
1. Differences Attract: An Experimental Study of Focusing in Economic Choice;ANDERSSON,,2016
2. Relative Thinking Theory;AZAR,;The Journal of Socio-Economics,2007
3. Do People Think About Absolute or Relative Price Differences When Choosing Between Substitute Goods?;AZAR,;Journal of Economic Psychology,2011
4. Does Part–Whole Bias Exist? An Experimental Investigation;BATEMAN,;The Economic Journal,1997
5. Range Effects in Multi-attribute Choice: An Experiment;BONDI,,2018
Cited by
54 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献