Fit for Purpose Assessment: A New Direction for IACUCs

Author:

Kinter Lewis B1,Johnson David K2,Weichbrod Robert H3,Prentice Ernest D4,Simmonds Richard C5,Houghton Paul W6,Whitney Jr Robert A7,DeGeorge Joseph8,DeHaven W Ron9,Kramer Klaas10,DeTolla Louis11

Affiliation:

1. President and Principal Scientist , GLP Scientific Consulting LLC, Unionville, Pennsylvania, USA

2. President of Cascades Biosciences , Sisters, Oregon, USA

3. Animal Program Administrator (retired) , National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA

4. Professor Emeritus , Department of Genetics, Cell Biology and Anatomy, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA

5. Professor Emeritus , University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada, USA

6. Primatologist and Principal , Primate Products, Inc, Immokalee, Florida, USA

7. Former Director of The National Center of Research Resources (NCRR) , NIH, Bethesda, MD and former Chair of the US Government Interagency Research Animal Committee (IRAC), Bethesda, Maryland, USA

8. Principal and Managing Partner , Bianca Holdings, LLC, Lansdale, Pennsylvania, USA

9. President , DeHaven Veterinary Solutions, LLC, El Dorado Hills, California, USA

10. Laboratory Animal Welfare Officer (retired) , VU University Amsterdam, the Netherlands

11. Founding Director of the Comparative Medicine Program (retired) , University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

Abstract

Abstract The organization and function of the institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) is the key component of government regulation and oversight of necessary scientific research using live animals and of AAALAC - International accreditation of animal care and use programs in the United States. The regulations, roles, and responsibilities of IACUCs have evolved since their inception 35 years ago from a limited focus on animal welfare and specific animal procedures to embracing scientific quality, data reproducibility and translation, and animal welfare as inextricably interdependent and critical components of generation of new scientific knowledge and medical treatments. A current challenge for IACUCs is in evaluating whether benefits to be derived (eg, new knowledge or treatments) justify any unavoidable pain, stress, or injury associated with proposed research protocols, because the former are long-term and at best speculative outcomes, whereas the latter are immediate and tangible for the study animals. Scientific consensus is that research most likely to generate significant new knowledge and medical treatments is that conducted to high scientific, technical, and quality standards and reported with full transparency to facilitate reproducibility. As an alternative to current benefits evaluations included in risk benefit and harm benefit constructs, the authors propose that IACUCs assess the proposed research for scientific quality and alignment of study elements with the study purpose (e.g., Fit for Purpose [FfP]), including justifications for study design components, selection of primary endpoints and technologies, rationale for data and statistical analyses, and research communication plans. Fit for Purpose endpoints are objective, immediate, and impactful as are the potential risks for study animals, and at the same time they are the best predictors for achievement of longer-term benefits. We propose that IACUCs and any revision of The ILAR Guide consider FfP concepts in place of traditional benefits assessment to accelerate the generation of new knowledge and treatments benefiting medical and veterinary patients and the environment through better science and animal welfare rather than to continue to rely on speculative future outcomes.

Funder

NIH

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,Animal Science and Zoology,General Medicine

Reference80 articles.

1. A brief history of use of animals in biomedical research and perspective on non-animal alternatives;Kinter;ILAR J,2021

2. Scientific knowledge and technology, animal experimentation, and pharmaceutical development;Kinter;ILAR J,2016

3. Medical science and the Cruelty to Animals Act 1876: a re-examination of anti-vivisectionism in provincial Britain;Finn;Stud Hist Phil Biol Biomed Sci,2015

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3