Using ChatGPT to evaluate cancer myths and misconceptions: artificial intelligence and cancer information

Author:

Johnson Skyler B12ORCID,King Andy J23,Warner Echo L24,Aneja Sanjay56,Kann Benjamin H7,Bylund Carma L8

Affiliation:

1. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute , Salt Lake City, UT, USA

2. Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute , Salt Lake City, UT, USA

3. Department of Communication, University of Utah , Salt Lake City, UT, USA

4. College of Nursing, University of Utah , Salt Lake City, UT, USA

5. Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale School of Medicine , New Haven, CT, USA

6. Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine , New Haven, CT, USA

7. Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA, USA

8. Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida College of Medicine , Gainesville, FL, USA

Abstract

AbstractData about the quality of cancer information that chatbots and other artificial intelligence systems provide are limited. Here, we evaluate the accuracy of cancer information on ChatGPT compared with the National Cancer Institute’s (NCI’s) answers by using the questions on the “Common Cancer Myths and Misconceptions” web page. The NCI’s answers and ChatGPT answers to each question were blinded, and then evaluated for accuracy (accurate: yes vs no). Ratings were evaluated independently for each question, and then compared between the blinded NCI and ChatGPT answers. Additionally, word count and Flesch-Kincaid readability grade level for each individual response were evaluated. Following expert review, the percentage of overall agreement for accuracy was 100% for NCI answers and 96.9% for ChatGPT outputs for questions 1 through 13 (ĸ = ‒0.03, standard error = 0.08). There were few noticeable differences in the number of words or the readability of the answers from NCI or ChatGPT. Overall, the results suggest that ChatGPT provides accurate information about common cancer myths and misconceptions.

Funder

Huntsman Cancer Institute

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Cited by 82 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3