A scoping review of the use of quality improvement methods by community organizations in the United States, Australia, New Zealand, and Canada to improve health and well-being in community settings

Author:

Turner Mallory1,Carr Tara2,John Randall3,Ramaswamy Rohit4

Affiliation:

1. Department of Maternal and Child Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Gillings School of Global Public Health , Chapel Hill, NC, USA

2. Department of Nutrition, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Gillings School of Global Public Health , Chapel Hill, NC, USA

3. Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Gillings School of Global Public Health , Chapel Hill, NC, USA

4. Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center , Anderson Center for Health Systems Excellence, Cincinnati, OH, USA

Abstract

Abstract Background Health-care facilities have used quality improvement (QI) methods extensively to improve quality of care. However, addressing complex public health issues such as coronavirus disease 2019 and their underlying structural determinants requires community-level innovations beyond health care. Building community organizations’ capacity to use QI methods is a promising approach to improving community health and well-being. Objectives We explore how community health improvement has been defined in the literature, the extent to which community organizations have knowledge and skill in QI and how communities have used QI to drive community-level improvements. Methods Per a published study protocol, we searched Scopus, Web of Science, and Proquest Health management for articles between 2000 and 2019 from USA, Australia, New Zealand, and Canada. We included articles describing any QI intervention in a community setting to improve community well-being. We screened, extracted, and synthesized data. We performed a quantitative tabulation and a thematic analysis to summarize results. Results Thirty-two articles met inclusion criteria, with 31 set in the USA. QI approaches at the community level were the same as those used in clinical settings, and many involved multifaceted interventions targeting chronic disease management or health promotion, especially among minority and low-income communities. There was little discussion on how well these methods worked in community settings or whether they required adaptations for use by community organizations. Moreover, decision-making authority over project design and implementation was typically vested in organizations outside the community and did not contribute to strengthening the capability of community organizations to undertake QI independently. Conclusion Most QI initiatives undertaken in communities are extensions of projects in health-care settings and are not led by community residents. There is urgent need for additional research on whether community organizations can use these methods independently to tackle complex public health problems that extend beyond health-care quality.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference60 articles.

1. Building a Culture of Health;Robert Wood Johnson Foundation,2021

2. Thriving Together: A Springboard for Equitable Recovery & Resilience in Communities Across America;Milstein,2021

3. Public health 3.0: a call to action for public health to meet the challenges of the 21st century;DeSalvo;Prev Chronic Dis,2017

4. Does quality improvement improve quality?;Dixon-Woods;Futur Hopsital J,2016

5. Unpacking the black box of improvement;Ramaswamy;Int J Qual Heal Care,2018

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3