Trends in Prehospital Blood, Crystalloid, and Colloid Administration in Accordance With Changes in Tactical Combat Casualty Care Guidelines

Author:

Clarke Emily E1,Hamm James2,Fisher Andrew D34,April Michael D56,Long Brit J76,Mdaki Kennedy S8,Hill Ronnie8,Bynum James A8ORCID,Schauer Steven G768ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Notre Dame, South Bend, IN, USA

2. Soldier Recovery Brigade, National Capital Region, Walter Reed, MD, USA

3. University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM 87106, USA

4. Texas Army National Guard, Austin, TX, USA

5. 40th FRSD, Forward Resuscitative Surgical Team, Fort Carson, CO 80193, USA

6. Department of Emergency Medicine, Brooke Army Medical Center, JBSA Fort Sam Houston, TX 78234, USA

7. Department of Military and Emergency Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA

8. US Army Institute of Surgical Research, JBSA Fort Sam Houston, TX 78234, USA

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction Hemorrhage is the leading threat to the survival of battlefield casualties. This study aims to investigate the types of fluids and blood products administered in prehospital trauma encounters to discover the effectiveness of Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC) recommendations. Materials and Methods This is a secondary analysis of a previously described dataset from the Department of Defense Trauma Registry with a focus on prehospital fluid and blood administration in conjunction with changes in the TCCC guidelines. We collected demographic information on each patient. We categorized receipt of each fluid type and blood product as a binary variable for each casualty and evaluated trends over 2007–2020 both unadjusted and controlling for injury severity and mechanism of injury. Results Our original dataset comprised 25,897 adult casualties from January 1, 2007 through March 17, 2020. Most (97.3%) of the casualties were male with a median age of 25. Most (95.5%) survived to hospital discharge, and 12.2% of the dataset received fluids of any kind. Medical personnel used crystalloids in 7.4% of encounters, packed red blood cells in 2.0%, and whole blood in 0.5% with very few receiving platelets or freeze-dried plasma. In the adjusted model, we noted significant year-to-year increases in intravenous fluid administration from 2014 to 2015 and 2018 to 2019, with significant decreases noted in 2008–2009, 2010–2012, and 2015–2016. We noted no significant increases in Hextend used, but we did note significant decreases in 2010–2012. For any blood product, we noted significant increases from 2016 to 2017, with decreases noted in 2009–2013, 2015–2016, and 2017–2018. Overall, we noted a general spike in all uses in 2011–2012 that rapidly dropped off 2012–2013. Crystalloids consistently outpaced the use of blood products. We noted a small upward trend in all blood products from 2017 to 2019. Conclusions Changes in TCCC guidelines did not immediately translate into changes in prehospital fluid administration practices. Crystalloid fluids continue to dominate as the most commonly administered fluid even after the 2014 TCCC guidelines changed to use of blood products over crystalloids. There should be future studies to investigate the reasons for delay in guideline implementation and efforts to improve adherence.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,General Medicine

Reference39 articles.

1. Death on the battlefield (2001–2011): implications for the future of combat casualty care;Eastridge;J Trauma Acute Care Surg,2012

2. Hemorrhagic blood failure: oxygen debt, coagulopathy and endothelial damage;White;J Trauma Acute Care Surg,2017

3. Guidelines for prehospital fluid resuscitation in the injured patient;Cotton;J Trauma,2009

4. TCCC updates: tactical combat casualty care curriculum annual update 2014;Giebner;J Spec Oper Med,2014

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3