Associations with Prehospital Antibiotic Receipt among Combat Casualties with Open Wounds: A Department of Defense Trauma Registry Study

Author:

Karp Marissa C1,April Michael D23,Newberry Ryan K4,Schauer Steven G356ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Adjutant General Captains Career Course , Fort Jackson, SC 29207, USA

2. 14th Field Hospital , Fort Stewart, GA, USA

3. Department of Military and Emergency Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences , Bethesda, MD 20814, USA

4. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health , Madison, WI, USA

5. Departments of Anesthesiology and Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine , Aurora, Colorado 80045, USA

6. Center for Combat and Battlefield (COMBAT) Research, University of Colorado School of Medicine , Aurora, Colorado 80045, USA

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction Current Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC) guidelines recommend antibiotic administration for all open wounds to prevent infection. We identified associations between demographics, procedures, and medicines with the receipt of prehospital antibiotics among combat casualties. Materials and Methods We used a series of emergency department procedure codes to identify adult subjects within the Department of Defense Trauma Registry from January 2007 to August 2016 who sustained open wounds. We compared demographics, procedures, and medicines administered among casualties receiving prehospital wound prophylaxis versus casualties not receiving antibiotic prophylaxis. We controlled for confounders with multivariable logistical regression. Results We identified 18,366 encounters meeting inclusion criteria. Antibiotic recipients (n = 2384) were comparable to nonrecipients (n = 15,982) with regard to age and sex. Antibiotic recipients were more likely to sustain injuries from firearms and undergo all procedures examined related to hemorrhage control, airway management, pneumothorax treatment, and volume replacement except for intraosseous access. Antibiotic recipients were less likely to sustain injuries from explosives. Antibiotic recipients had a modestly higher survival than nonrecipients (97.4% versus 96.0%). Associations with prehospital antibiotic receipt in multivariable logistic regression included non-North Atlantic Treaty Organization military force affiliation (odds ratio (OR) 4.65, 95% CI, 1.0-20.8), tachycardia (OR 3.4, 95% CI, 1.1-10.5), intubation (OR 2.0, 95% CI, 1.1-3.8), and administration of tranexamic acid (OR 5.6, 95% CI, 1.2-26.5). Conclusions The proportion of combat casualties with open wounds receiving prehospital antibiotics was low despite published recommendations for early antibiotics in patients with open wounds. These findings highlight the ongoing need for additional educational and quality assurance initiatives to continue improving adherence to TCCC guidelines with regard to prehospital antibiotic administration. Future studies are necessary to determine reasons for suboptimal TCCC guideline compliance.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,General Medicine

Reference38 articles.

1. A descriptive analysis of notional casualties sustained at the joint readiness training center: implications for health service support during large-scale combat operations;April;Med J (Ft Sam Houst Tex),2021

2. The effect of a golden hour policy on the morbidity and mortality of combat casualties;Kotwal;JAMA Surg,2016

3. The golden hour of casualty care: rapid handoff to surgical team is associated with improved survival in war-injured US service members;Shackelford;Ann Surg,2023

4. Prolonged field care: beyond the “Golden Hour”;Keenan;Wilderness Environ Med,2017

5. Deconstructing the definition of prolonged field care;Keenan;J Spec Oper Med,2015

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3