Oxygen Management During Collective Aeromedical Evacuation of 36 COVID-19 Patients With ARDS

Author:

Beaussac Madeleine1,Boutonnet Mathieu2,Koch Lionel3,Paris Raphael4,Di Filippo Julia1,Distinguin Berangère5,Murris Sophie6,Dupre Henri-Louis7,Muller Violaine2,Turc Jean89

Affiliation:

1. 160th Military Medical Unit, 10th Military Medical Center, Istres 13800, France

2. Intensive Care Unit and Anesthesiology Department, Military Teaching Hospital Percy, Clamart 92140, France

3. Bacteriology Unit, French Armed Forces Biomedical Research Institute (IRBA), Bretigny sur Orge 91220, France

4. Intensive Care Unit and Anesthesiology Department, Military Teaching Hospital Laveran, Marseille 13000, France

5. 158th Military Medical Unit, 10th Military Medical Center, Salon de Provence 13661, France

6. 148th Military Medical Unit, 9th Military Medical Center, Hyeres 83400, France

7. Intensive Care Unit and Anesthesiology Department, Military Teaching Hospital Saint-Anne, Toulon 83000, France

8. Intensive Care Unit and Anesthesiology Department, Military Teaching Hospital Desgenettes, Lyon 69003, France

9. Intensive Care Unit and Anesthesiology Department, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon 69437, France

Abstract

Abstract Objective The ongoing coronavirus disease-2019 pandemic leads to the saturation of critical care facilities worldwide. Collective aeromedical evacuations (MEDEVACS) might help rebalance the demand and supply of health care. If interhospital transport of patients suffering from ARDS is relatively common, little is known about the specific challenges of collective medevac. Oxygen management in such context is crucial. We describe our experience with a focus on this resource. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the first six collective medevac performed during the coronavirus disease-2019 pandemic by the French Military Health Service from March 17 to April 3, 2020. Oxygen management was compliant with international guidelines as well as aeronautical constraints and monitored throughout the flights. Presumed high O2 consumers were scheduled to board the last and disembark the first. Results Thirty-six mechanically ventilated patients were successfully transported within Europe. The duration of onboard ventilation was 185 minutes (145-198.5 minutes), including the flight, the boarding and disembarking periods. Oxygen intake was 1,650 L per patient per flight (1,350-1,950 L patient per flight) and 564 L per patient per hour (482-675 L per patient−1 per hour) and surpassed our anticipation. As anticipated, presumed high O2 consumers had a reduced ventilation duration onboard. The estimations of oxygen consumptions were frequently overshot, and only two hypoxemia episodes occurred. Conclusion Oxygen consumption was higher than expected, despite anticipation and predefined oxygen management measures, and encourages to a great caution in the processing of such collective medevac missions.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3