Digital Administrative Burdens: An Agenda for Analyzing the Citizen Experience of Digital Bureaucratic Encounters

Author:

Peeters Rik1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas (CIDE) , Ciudad de México , México

Abstract

AbstractInnovations in digital government are changing state–citizen interactions. While often seen as means to increase government efficiency and reduce compliance costs for citizens, a growing body of literature suggests citizens may also experience administrative burdens in such interactions. This article aims to provide some cohesion to the existing research and makes three specific contributions. First, it carves out a conceptual common ground by identifying digital administrative burdens and digital bureaucratic encounters as specific objects of study. Second, automated administrative decision making, digital interactions, and data-assisted decision making are identified as contemporary practices of particular relevance for future studies on the intersection of digital government and administrative burden. Studies suggest learning costs and psychological costs may be especially prevalent in digital bureaucratic encounters and that they often have distributive effects. Third, the article concludes with the formulation of several research themes for the further development of the field.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Public Administration

Reference76 articles.

1. Transforming the communication between citizens and government through AI-guided chatbots;Androutsopoulou;Government Information Quarterly,2019

2. Machine bias: There’s software used across the country to predict future criminals and it’s biased against blacks;Angwin;ProPublica,2016

3. Reducing compliance demands in government benefit programs improves the psychological well-being of target group members;Bækgaard;Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,2021

4. Public encounters: The history and future of face-to-face contact between public professionals and citizens;Bartels;Public Administration,2013

5. The governance of back-office integration;Bekkers;Public Management Review,2007

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3