Type and frequency of wild pig-domestic livestock contacts and operator concern for disease spread

Author:

McKee Sophie C12ORCID,Mooney Daniel F3ORCID,Miller Ryan S4

Affiliation:

1. National Wildlife Research Center, United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services , Fort Collins, CO, USA

2. Department of Economics, Colorado State University , Fort Collins, CO, USA

3. Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Colorado State University , Fort Collins, CO, USA

4. USDA/APHIS/ Center for Epidemiology and Animal Health, Natural Resource Research Center , Fort Collins, CO, USA

Abstract

Abstract Wild pigs (Sus scrofa) can levy substantial costs to domestic livestock operations and global supply chains due to disease introduction. Producers can take defensive action to avert these costs, but the factors influencing these decisions are not well understood. We examined survey data to characterize the type and frequency of contacts between wild pigs and domestic livestock and investigated the determinants of farm operator concern for disease introduction using an ordered logit model. We found that operators with livestock kept in buildings were more concerned about disease than those with livestock kept in fenced areas or that roam free. However, the latter are at greater risk due to more frequent reported contacts with wild pigs. Results indicate that concern is significantly associated with other characteristics of farm operations, such as operation size, perceived change in wild pig populations, and respondent demographics. Developing a better understanding of the factors influencing operator concern for disease spread can contribute to the improved design of prevention policy targeting small-scale livestock producers. This could help ensure the continued safety of livestock supply chains and reduce the risk of disease-related trade restrictions, along with continued support for disease surveillance and monitoring at the national scale, and prolonged control of domestic vectors such as invasive wild pigs, specifically in regions with the most small operations.

Funder

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous),Economics and Econometrics,Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous),Development,Food Science

Reference48 articles.

1. Biosecurity in Pig Farms: a Review;Alarcón;Porcine Health Management,2021

2. Evaluating the Efficacy of Boot Baths in Biosecurity Protocols;Amass;Journal of Swine Health and Production,2000

3. Impact of Wild Boar (Sus Scrofa) in its Introduced and Native Range: a Review;Barrios-Garcia;Biological Invasions,2012

4. Preventive Measures Aimed at Minimizing the Risk of African Swine Fever Virus Spread in Pig Farming Systems;Bellini;Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica,2016

5. Consequences Associated with the Recent Range Expansion of Nonnative Feral Swine;Bevins;Bioscience,2014

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3