Agricultural and Ecological Resources Safeguarded by the Prevention of Wild Pig Population Expansion
Author:
Jareb Colin1ORCID, Pepin Kim M.1, Miller Ryan S.2ORCID, Sykora Sarah13, Shwiff Stephanie A.1, McKee Sophie C.13ORCID
Affiliation:
1. National Wildlife Research Center, United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, 4101 Laporte Avenue, Fort Collins, CO 80521, USA 2. Center for Epidemiology and Animal Health, United States Department of Agriculture, Veterinary Services, Fort Collins, CO 80526, USA 3. Department of Economics, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA
Abstract
Wild pigs (Sus scrofa) are one of the most destructive invasive species in the US, known for causing extensive damage to agricultural commodities, natural resources, and property, and for transmitting diseases to livestock. Following the establishment of the National Feral Swine Damage Management Program (NFSDMP) in 2014, the expansion of wild pig populations has been successfully slowed. This paper combines two modeling approaches across eight separate models to characterize the expansion of wild pig populations in the absence of intervention by the NFSDMP and forecasts the value of a subset of resources safeguarded from the threat of wild pigs. The results indicate that if wild pigs had continued spreading at pre-program levels, they would have spread extensively across the US, with significant geographic variation across modeling scenarios. Further, by averting the threat of wild pigs, a substantial amount of crops, land, property, and livestock was safeguarded by the NFSDMP. Cumulatively, between 2014 and 2021, wild pig populations were prevented from spreading to an average of 724 counties and an average of USD 40.2 billion in field crops, pasture, grasses, and hay was safeguarded. The results demonstrate that intervention by the NFSDMP has delivered significant ecological and economic benefits that were not previously known.
Funder
US Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, National Feral Swine Damage Management Program
Reference25 articles.
1. What is in a “common” name? A call for consistent terminology for nonnative Sus scrofa;Keiter;Wildl. Soc. Bull.,2016 2. VerCauteren, K.C., Beasley, J.C., Ditchkoff, S.S., Mayer, J.J., Roloff, G.J., and Strickland, B.K. (2020). Invasive Wild Pigs in North America: Ecology, Impacts, and Management, CRC Press. [1st ed.]. 3. Lowe, S., Browne, M., Boudjelas, S., and De Poorter, M. (2020). 100 of the World’s Worst Invasive Alien Species: A Selection from the Global Invasive Species Database, Invasive Species Specialist Group. 4. U.S Department of Agriculture (2018). Five Year Report FY 2014-2018, National Feral Swine Damage Management Program. 5. Transient population dynamics drive the spread of invasive wild pigs and reveal impacts of management in North America;Miller;Biol. Invasions,2023
|
|