How to Detect and Influence Looking Up Answers to Political Knowledge Questions in Web Surveys

Author:

Gummer Tobias1ORCID,Kunz Tanja2ORCID,Rettig Tobias3,Höhne Jan Karem4

Affiliation:

1. GESIS—Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences Team Leader and Senior Researcher, , Mannheim, Germany ; Private Lecturer, School of Social Sciences, University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany

2. GESIS—Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences Senior Researcher, , Mannheim, Germany

3. School of Social Sciences, University of Mannheim Postdoctoral Researcher, , Mannheim, Germany ; Postdoctoral Researcher, Mannheim Center for European Social Research (MZES), Mannheim, Germany

4. German Centre for Higher Education Research and Science Studies (DZHW), Leibniz University Hannover Junior Professor, , Hannover, Germany ; Research Fellow, Research and Expertise Centre for Survey Methodology (RECSM), Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain

Abstract

Abstract When answering political knowledge questions in web surveys, respondents can look up the correct answer on the Internet. This response behavior artificially inflates political knowledge scores that are supposed to measure fact-based information. In the present study, we address the existing knowledge gaps of previous research regarding looking up answers to political knowledge questions in web surveys. We conducted an experimental study based on the German Internet Panel, a large-scale population survey that uses a probability-based sample. Based on this experiment, we show that instructions help to reduce the number of lookups to knowledge questions in web surveys. We provide further evidence that looking up answers results in more correct answers to knowledge questions and, thus, in inflated political knowledge scores. Finally, our findings illustrate the challenges and benefits of using self-reported or paradata-based lookup measures as well as a combined measure that aims at utilizing both to detect lookups to political knowledge questions in web surveys.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

History and Philosophy of Science,General Social Sciences,Sociology and Political Science,History,Communication

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Effects of objective and perceived burden on response quality in web surveys;International Journal of Social Research Methodology;2024-08-19

2. Augmenting Surveys with Paradata, Administrative Data, and Contextual Data;Public Opinion Quarterly;2023-06-10

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3