The association of intensive blood pressure treatment and non-fatal cardiovascular or serious adverse events in older adults with mortality: mediation analysis in SPRINT

Author:

Krishnaswami Ashok123ORCID,Rich Michael W4,Kwak Min Ji5,Goyal Parag6ORCID,Forman Daniel E78,Damluji Abdulla A910,Solomon Matthew1112,Rana Jamal S1112,Kado Deborah M121314,Odden Michelle C214

Affiliation:

1. Section of Geriatric Medicine, Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University , USA

2. Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, US Department of Veterans Affairs, VA Palo Alto Health Care System , USA

3. Division of Cardiology , 270 International Circle, Building 3, 2nd Floor , USA

4. Division of Cardiology, Washington University , USA

5. University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston , Houston, TX , USA

6. Program for The Care and Study of the Aging Heart, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine , New York, NY , USA

7. Department of Medicine (Geriatrics and Cardiology), University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, PA , USA

8. Pittsburgh GRECC, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System , Pittsburgh, PA , USA

9. The Inova Center of Outcomes Research, Inova Heart and Vascular Institute , USA

10. Division of Cardiology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine , USA

11. Division of Cardiology, Kaiser Permanente Oakland Medical Center , USA

12. Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California , USA

13. Department of Medicine/Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University , USA

14. Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University , USA

Abstract

Abstract Aims Randomized clinical trials of hypertension treatment intensity evaluate the effects on incident major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Occurrences after a non-fatal index event have not been rigorously evaluated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of intensive (<120 mmHg) to standard (<140 mmHg) blood pressure (BP) treatment with mortality mediated through a non-fatal MACE or non-fatal SAE in 9361 participants in the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial. Methods and results Logistic regression and causal mediation modelling to obtain direct and mediated effects of intensive BP treatment. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality (ACM). Secondary outcomes were cardiovascular (CVM) and non-CV mortality (non-CVM). The direct effect of intensive treatment was a lowering of ACM [odds ratio (OR) 0.75, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.60–0.94]. The MACE-mediated effect substantially attenuated (OR 0.96, 95% CI: 0.92–0.99) ACM, while the SAE-mediated effect was associated with increased (OR 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01–1.05) ACM. Similar patterns were noted for intensive BP treatment on CVM and non-CVM. We also noted that SAE incidence was 3.9-fold higher than MACE incidence (13.7 vs. 3.5%), and there were a total of 365 (3.9%) ACM cases, with non-CVM being 2.6-fold higher than CVM [2.81% (263/9361) vs. 1.09% (102/9361)]. The SAE to MACE and non-CVM to CVM preponderance was found across all age groups, with the ≥80-year age group having the highest differences. Conclusion The current analytic techniques demonstrated that intensive BP treatment was associated with an attenuated mortality benefit when it was MACE-mediated and possibly harmful when it was SAE-mediated. Current cardiovascular trial reporting of treatment effects does not allow expansion of the lens to focus on important occurrences after the index event.

Funder

American Heart Association

National Institute on Aging

Pepper Scholars Program of the Johns Hopkins University Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Epidemiology

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3