Professional ethics survey identifies strengths and areas for improvement in the American Ornithological Society

Author:

Walsh Jennifer1,Bowman Reed2ORCID,Brawn Jeffrey D3ORCID,Covino Kristen M4ORCID,Dugger Katie M5ORCID,Fleischer Robert C6ORCID,Houtz Jennifer L7ORCID,Mahoney Sean M89,Pruett-Jones Melinda10ORCID,Tarwater Corey E11ORCID,Fair Jeanne12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Fuller Evolutionary Biology Program, Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Cornell University , Ithaca, New York , USA

2. Avian Ecology Program, Archbold Biological Station , Venus, Florida , USA

3. Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign , Urbana, Illinois , USA

4. Biology Department, Loyola Marymount University , Los Angeles, California , USA

5. U.S. Geological Survey, Oregon Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Fisheries, Wildlife and Conservation Sciences, Oregon State University , Corvallis, Oregon , USA

6. Center for Conservation Genomics, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute , Washington, D.C. , USA

7. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University , Ithaca, New York , USA

8. Department of Wildlife, Cal Poly Humboldt , Arcata, California , USA

9. School of Natural Resources and the Environment, The University of Arizona , Tucson, Arizona , USA

10. American Ornithological Society , Chicago, Illinois , USA

11. Department of Zoology and Physiology, University of Wyoming , Laramie, Wyoming , USA

12. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Biosecurity and Public Health , Los Alamos, New Mexico , USA

Abstract

Abstract In response to a growing need to foster ethical behavior within scientific societies, the American Ornithological Society’s (AOS) professional ethics committee conducted a survey of members in spring 2021 to identify the primary challenges and ethical conduct concerns. The survey indicated that the AOS has a strong culture of professional ethics and highlighted areas needing improvement. Participants identified discrimination and lack of inclusivity (44%), scientific fraud and abuse in data and publications (35%), and sexual harassment (31%) as the highest potential risks for unethical behavior in our organization. Moreover, approximately one-third of respondents (34%) had personally witnessed or experienced unethical behavior as an AOS member. A smaller proportion (16%) felt pressure to compromise their work standards in ornithology. These findings are likely representative of broader patterns that professional, scientific societies face as they seek to provide safe, welcoming, and thoughtful environments for researchers to share their work, gain valuable feedback, and develop collaborations. The survey results also create a framework for workshops, training opportunities, and disseminating information within the AOS and, ideally, with the broader, international community of ornithologists.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Animal Science and Zoology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3