Smart automotive technology adherence to the law: (de)constructing road rules for autonomous system development, verification and safety

Author:

McLachlan Scott1,Neil Martin2,Dube Kudakwashe3,Bogani Ronny4,Fenton Norman5,Schaffer Burkhard6

Affiliation:

1. SCRIPT Centre, Edinburgh Law School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK; Birmingham Law School, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Risk and Information Management, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK; Health informatics and Knowledge Engineering Research (HiKER) Group

2. Risk and Information Management, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK

3. School of Fundamental Sciences, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand; Health informatics and Knowledge Engineering Research (HiKER) Group

4. SCRIPT Centre, Edinburgh Law School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

5. Risk and Information Management, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK

6. SCRIPT Centre, Edinburgh Law School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

Abstract

Abstract Driving is an intuitive task that requires skill, constant alertness and vigilance for unexpected events. The driving task also requires long concentration spans, focusing on the entire task for prolonged periods, and sophisticated negotiation skills with other road users including wild animals. Modern motor vehicles include an array of smart assistive and autonomous driving systems capable of subsuming some, most, or in limited cases, all of the driving task. Building these smart automotive systems requires software developers with highly technical software engineering skills, and now a lawyer’s in-depth knowledge of traffic legislation as well. This article presents an approach for deconstructing the complicated legalese of traffic law and representing its requirements and flow. Our approach (de)constructs road rules in legal terminology and specifies them in ‘structured English logic’ that is expressed as ‘Boolean logic’ for automation and ‘Lawmaps’ for visualization. We demonstrate an example using these tools leading to the construction and validation of a ‘Bayesian Network model’. We strongly believe these tools to be approachable by programmers and the general public, useful in development of Artificial Intelligence to underpin motor vehicle smart systems, and in validation to ensure these systems are considerate of the law when making decisions.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Law,Library and Information Sciences

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A Legal System to Modify Autonomous Vehicle Designs in Transnational Contexts;Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications;2023-12-07

2. Driving Decision Making of Autonomous Vehicle According to Queensland Overtaking Traffic Rules;The Review of Socionetwork Strategies;2023-09-12

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3