Big data in genomic research for big questions with examples from covid-19 and other zoonoses

Author:

Wassenaar Trudy M1,Ussery David W2ORCID,Rosel Adriana Cabal3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Molecular Microbiology and Genomics Consultants , Tannenstrasse 7, 55576 Zotzenheim , Germany

2. Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences , 4301 W Markham St, Little Rock, AR 72205 , USA

3. Institute for Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Division for Public Health, Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety , Währingerstrasse 25a, 1096, Vienna , Austria

Abstract

AbstractOmics research inevitably involves the collection and analysis of big data, which can only be handled by automated approaches. Here we point out that the analysis of big data in the field of genomics dictates certain requirements, such as specialized software, quality control of input data, and simplification for visualization of the results. The latter results in a loss of information, as is exemplified for phylogenetic trees. Clear communication of big data analyses can be enhanced by novel visualization strategies. The interpretation of findings is sometimes hampered when dedicated analytical tools are not fully understood by microbiologists, while the researchers performing these analyses may not have a full overview of the biology of the microbes under study. These issues are illustrated here, using SARS-Cov-2 and Salmonella enterica as zoonotic examples. Whereas in scientific communications jargon should be avoided or explained, nomenclature to group similar organisms and distinguish these from more distant relatives is not only essential, but also influences the interpretation of results. Unfortunately, changes in taxonomically accepted names are now so frequent that they hamper rather than assist research, as is illustrated with difficulties of microbiome studies. Nomenclature to group viral isolates, as is done for SARS-Cov2, is also not without difficulties. Some weaknesses in current omics research stem from poor quality of data or biased databases, and problems can be magnified by machine learning approaches. Moreover, the overall opus of scientific publications can now be considered “big data”, as is illustrated by the avalanche of COVID-19-related publications. The peer-review model of scientific publishing is only barely coping with this novel situation, resulting in retractions and the publication of bogus works. The avalanche of scientific publications that originated from the current pandemic can obstruct literature searches, and this will unfortunately continue over time.

Funder

NIH

National Science Foundation

Arkansas Research Alliance

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology,General Medicine,Biotechnology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3