Survival on four compared with three times per week haemodialysis in high ultrafiltration patients: an observational study

Author:

Fotheringham James12ORCID,Latimer Nicholas2,Froissart Marc3,Kronenberg Florian4,Stenvinkel Peter5,Floege Jürgen6,Eckardt Kai-Uwe7,Wheeler David C89

Affiliation:

1. Sheffield Kidney Institute, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Sheffield, UK

2. School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK

3. Clinical Trial Unit, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland

4. Institute of Genetic Epidemiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria

5. Department of Renal Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden

6. Department of Nephrology, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany

7. Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité–Universitätsmedizin-Berlin, Berlin, Germany

8. Department of Renal Medicine, University College London, UK

9. George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Abstract

Abstract Background The harm caused by the long interdialytic interval in three-times-per-week haemodialysis regimens (3×WHD) may relate to fluid accumulation and associated high ultrafiltration rate (UFR). Four-times-per-week haemodialysis (4×WHD) may offer a solution, but its impact on mortality, hospitalization and vascular access complications is unknown. Methods From the AROii cohort of incident in-centre haemodialysis patients, 3×WHD patients with a UFR >10 mL/kg/h were identified. The hazard for the outcomes of mortality, hospitalization and vascular access complications in those who switched to 4×WHD compared with staying on 3×WHD was estimated using a marginal structural Cox proportional hazards model. Adjustment included baseline patient and treatment characteristics with inverse probability weighting used to adjust for time-varying UFR and cardiovascular comorbidities. Results From 10 637 European 3×WHD patients, 3842 (36%) exceeded a UFR >10 mL/kg/h. Of these, 288 (7.5%) started 4×WHD and at baseline were more comorbid. Event rates while receiving 4×WHD compared with 3×WHD were 12.6 compared with 10.8 per 100 patient years for mortality, 0.96 compared with 0.65 per year for hospitalization and 14.7 compared with 8.0 per 100 patient years for vascular access complications. Compared with 3×WHD, the unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) for mortality on 4×WHD was 1.05 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78–1.42]. Following adjustment for baseline demographics, time-varying treatment probability and censoring risks, this HR was 0.73 (95% CI 0.50–1.05; P = 0.095). Despite these adjustments on 4×WHD, the HR for hospitalization remained elevated and vascular access complications were similar to 3×WHD. Conclusions This observational study was not able to demonstrate a mortality benefit in patients switched to 4×WHD. To demonstrate the true benefits of 4×WHD requires a large, well-designed clinical trial. Our data may help in the design of such a study.

Funder

Amgen

FMC

National Institute for Health Research

National Health Service

NIHR

Department of Health and Social Care

Vifor Pharma and Novartis

National Institute for Health Research Clinician Scientist Fellowship

Fresenius

Vifor

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Transplantation,Nephrology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3