‘Trying to patch a broken system’: Exploring institutional work among care professions for interprofessional collaboration

Author:

Hald Andreas Nielsen1ORCID,Bech Mickael2,Enemark Ulrika1,Shaw Jay3,Burau Viola1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Public Health, Aarhus University , Aarhus 8000 , Bartholins Allé 2, Denmark

2. Department of Health, VIVE—The Danish Center for Social Science Research , Åbyhøj 8230 , Denmark

3. Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Toronto University , Toronto, ON , Canada

Abstract

Abstract There is a growing interest in understanding when and why interprofessional collaborations are well functioning, especially within healthcare systems. However, more knowledge is needed about how professionals affect and contribute to these collaborations when they engage in them. To address this shortcoming, this study aims to contribute to professional and organizational studies of interprofessional collaboration by providing novel insights into how professionals engage in and contribute to interprofessional collaborations. It builds on a theoretical perspective of examining professionals’ everyday collaboration practices through the interplay between temporal-oriented agency and institutional work. It applies this perspective to a case study of interprofessional collaboration between personal workers (PWs), nurses, and therapists in the home care sector in Denmark. Overall, the findings show that the professionals engaged in and contributed to the interprofessional collaboration by ‘trying to patch a broken system’. All three professional groups did this primarily by ‘adopting new practices to deal with inept institutionalized practices’ to maintain collaboration. Additionally, some PWs ‘failed to enact institutionalized practices’ to disrupt the collaboration, and some nurses and therapists ‘invented and established mechanisms’ to create new arrangements for the collaboration. Based on the findings, the study demonstrates that certain dimensions of agency are associated with certain types of institutional work. Furthermore, the study suggests that the interplay between agency and institutional work varies between professional groups, influenced by their relative autonomy.

Funder

Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Denmark

Helsefonden, Denmark

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference42 articles.

1. ‘Things of Boundaries’;Abbott;Social Research,1995

2. ‘Making Electronic Health Records (EHRs) Work: Informal Talk and Workarounds in Healthcare Organizations’;Barrett;Health Communication,2017

3. ‘Institutional Work and the Paradox of Embedded Agency’,;Battilana,2009

4. ‘How to Claim What Is Mine: Negotiating Professional Roles in Inter-organizational Projects’;Bos-de Vos;Journal of Professions and Organization,2019

5. ‘Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology’;Braun;Qualitative Research in Psychology,2006

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3