Reproducibility of A Posteriori Dietary Patterns across Time and Studies: A Scoping Review

Author:

Edefonti Valeria1ORCID,De Vito Roberta234,Salvatori Andrea1,Bravi Francesca1,Patel Linia1,Dalmartello Michela1,Ferraroni Monica1

Affiliation:

1. Branch of Medical Statistics, Biometry, and Epidemiology “G. A. Maccacaro”, Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy

2. Department of Biostatistics, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA

3. Data Science Initiative, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA

4. Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA

Abstract

ABSTRACT Few studies have considered if a posteriori dietary patterns (DPs) are generalizable across different centers or studies, or if they are consistently seen over time. To date, no systematic search of the literature on these topics has been carried out. A scoping review was conducted through a systematic search on the PubMed database. In the current review, we included the 34 articles examining the extent to which a posteriori DPs were consistently seen: 1) across centers from the same study or across different studies potentially representing different populations or countries (here indicated as cross-study reproducibility) and 2) over longer time periods (i.e., ≥2 y) (here indicated as stability over time). Selected articles (published in 1981–2019, 32% from 2010 onwards) were based on observational studies, mostly from Europe and North America. Five articles were based on children and/or adolescents and 14 articles included adults (2 men; 12 women, of whom 3 were pregnant women). A posteriori DPs were mostly derived (32 articles) with principal component or factor analyses. Among the 9 articles assessing DP reproducibility across studies (number of centers/studies: 2–27; median: 3), 5 provided a formal assessment using statistical methods (4 index-based approaches of different complexity, 1 statistical model). A median of 4 DPs was reproduced across centers/studies (range: 1–7). Among the 25 articles assessing DP stability over time (number of time-occasions: 2–6; median: 3), 19 provided a formal assessment with statistical methods (17 index-based and/or test-based approaches, 1 statistical model, 1 with both strategies). The number and composition of DPs remained mostly stable over time. Based on the limited evidence collected, most identified DPs showed good reproducibility across studies and stability over time. However, when present within the single studies, the criteria for the formal assessment of cross-study reproducibility or stability over time were generally very basic.

Funder

Università degli Studi di Milano

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Nutrition and Dietetics,Medicine (miscellaneous),Food Science

Reference50 articles.

1. Dietary pattern analysis: a new direction in nutritional epidemiology;Hu;Curr Opin Lipidol,2002

2. Empirically derived eating patterns using factor or cluster analysis: a review;Newby;Nutr Rev,2004

3. Evaluating dietary patterns: the role of reduced rank regression;Weikert;Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care,2016

4. Dietary patterns, approaches, and multicultural perspective;Tucker;Appl Physiol Nutr Metab,2010

5. Reproducibility and validity of a posteriori dietary patterns: a systematic review;Edefonti;Adv Nutr,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3