A novel conceptual approach to lean: value, psychological conditions for engagement with work and perceived organizational support in hospital care

Author:

Al-hakim Latif1,Sevdalis Nick2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Business, University of Southern Queensland, West Street, Toowoomba, QLD 4350, Australia

2. Centre for Implementation Science, Health Service and Population Research Department, King’s College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, UK

Abstract

Abstract Background Lean thinking (LT) has emerged as a promising approach for reducing waste and improving efficiency. However, its applicability to and effectiveness within healthcare, particularly within hospital-based care, remains clouded by uncertainty. This paper attempts to answer the question ‘how lean thinking can best be applied to hospital-based care’. Methods Narrative review and conceptual synthesis Results We first review the principles of LT and how some of them are challenging to apply within hospital-based care. We then highlight that lean is an approach that was always meant as a combination of technical expertise and a focus on people—supported by a suite of human resource management supportive practices. We proceed to introduce evidence stemming from the literature studies on perceived organizational support and the psychological conditions for successful staff engagement with their work (namely, psychological meaningfulness, availability and safety as experienced by staff) and review how they may apply to hospital-based health workers. We finally advance a set of hypotheses regarding how different facets of value in a hospital care pathway may be correlated and these relationships mediated/moderated by perceived organizational support and the psychological conditions for engagement with work. Conclusion We conclude with a discussion of the limitations of our work and the aspiration that the conceptual analysis we have offered is a useful and actionable framework for hospital management to explore how best to support their staff—in a manner that ultimately achieves better quality and patient experience of care.

Funder

King's Health Partners

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy,General Medicine

Reference62 articles.

1. Made to fit: how practices vary as they diffuse;Ansari;Acad Manage Rev,2010

2. Key determinants of lean production adoption: evidence from the aerospace sector;Martinez-Jurado;Prod Plann Control,2014

3. Lean implementation failures: the role of organizational ambidexterity;Secchi;Int J Prod Econ,2019

4. Seeing the picture through “lean thinking”;Ben-Tovim;BMJ,2007

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3