Contemporaneous patient and health professional views of patient-centred care: a systematic review

Author:

Jaensch Daniel1,Baker Nicky2,Gordon Susan2

Affiliation:

1. College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia

2. Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia

Abstract

Abstract Objective To understand the domains of agreement and disagreement, related to person-centred care, between the patient and healthcare professional during a shared episode of care. Design A systematic review following the PRISMA protocol searched PubMed (Medline), CINAHL, PsychInfo and Scopus using keywords for health professionals, patients and patient-centred care. A descriptive-interpretive method was used to identify domains described in the person-centred care framework. Setting Research conducted in all healthcare settings (inpatient, outpatient, community) were included. Participants Research which presented the contemporaneous perspectives of a health professional and the person they were providing services to were included. Intervention(s) Research regarding the delivery of any type of health service was included. Main Outcome Measure(s) The person-centred care framework which includes Structure, Process and Outcome as measures for implementing person-centred care was used to interpret and summarize the data. Results After title and abstract screening against inclusion and exclusion criteria, 15 of 1,406 studies were critically appraised. High levels of contemporaneous agreement were identified for easily accessible, supportive and accommodating environments, where information sharing occurred. Contemporaneous agreement occurred most often between patients and healthcare professionals in the importance of sharing information across all geographical settings, with greatest disagreement of patient involvement in the European and American hospital environments. Conclusions Greater understanding of the context of information sharing and drivers for management preferences may support shared decision-making and increase satisfaction. More information regarding contemporaneous experiences of healthcare episodes is required to further inform patient-centred care practices and optimize health outcomes.

Funder

Flinders University College of Medicine and Public Health

Flinders University and Aged Care Housing Group Adelaide Australia

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy,General Medicine

Reference40 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3