Beyond ‘find and fix’: improving quality and safety through resilient healthcare systems

Author:

Anderson J E1,Ross A J2,Back J1,Duncan M3,Snell P4,Hopper A5,Jaye P6

Affiliation:

1. Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King’s College London, London, UK

2. Dental School, School of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK

3. Department of Psychology, IOPPN, King’s College London, London, UK

4. Patricia Snell Healthcare Consulting, London, UK

5. Guy’s and St. Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

6. Simulation and Interactive Learning (SaIL) Centre, St Thomas’ Hospital, King's Health Partners, London, UK

Abstract

Abstract Objective The aim was to develop a method based on resilient healthcare principles to proactively identify system vulnerabilities and quality improvement interventions. Design Ethnographic methods to understand work as it is done in practice using concepts from resilient healthcare, the Concepts for Applying Resilience Engineering model and the four key activities that are proposed to underpin resilient performance—anticipating, monitoring, responding and learning. Setting Accident and Emergency Department (ED) and the Older People’s Unit (OPU) of a large teaching hospital in central London. Participants ED—observations 104 h, and 14 staff interviews. OPU—observations 60 h, and 15 staff interviews. Results Data were analysed to identify targets for quality improvement. In the OPU, discharge was a complex and variable process that was difficult to monitor. A system to integrate information and clearly show progress towards discharge was needed. In the ED, patient flow was identified as a complex high-intensity activity that was not supported by the existing data systems. The need for a system to integrate and display information about both patient and organizational factors was identified. In both settings, adaptive capacity was limited by the absence of systems to monitor the work environment. Conclusions The study showed that using resilient healthcare principles to inform quality improvement was feasible and focused attention on challenges that had not been addressed by traditional quality improvement practices. Monitoring patient and workflow in both the ED and the OPU was identified as a priority for supporting staff to manage the complexity of the work.

Funder

Guy’s and St. Thomas’s Charity

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3