Automated categorization of virtual reality studies in cardiology based on the device usage: a bibliometric analysis (2010–2022)

Abstract

AbstractAimsCurrently, virtual reality (VR) constitutes a vital aspect of digital health, necessitating an overview of study trends. We classified type A studies as those in which health care providers utilized VR devices and type B studies as those in which patients employed the devices. This study aimed to analyse the characteristics of each type of studies using natural language processing (NLP) methods.Methods and resultsLiterature related to VR in cardiovascular research was searched in PubMed between 2010 and 2022. The characteristics of studies were analysed based on their classification as type A or type B. Abstracts of the studies were used as corpus for text mining. A binary logistic regression model was trained to automatically categorize the abstracts into the two study types. Classification performance was evaluated by accuracy, precision, recall, F-1 score, and c-statistics of the receiver operator curve (ROC) analysis. In total, 171 articles met the inclusion criteria, where 120 (70.2%) were type A studies and 51 (29.8%) were type B studies. Type A studies had a higher proportion of case reports than type B studies (18.3% vs. 3.9%, P = 0.01). As for abstract classification, the binary logistic regression model yielded 88% accuracy and an area under the ROC of 0.98. The words ‘training’, ‘3d’, and ‘simulation’ were the most powerful determinants of type A studies, while the words ‘patients’, ‘anxiety’, and ‘rehabilitation’ were more indicative for type B studies.ConclusionsNLP methods revealed the characteristics of the two types of VR-related research in cardiology.