Uncertainty, Evidence, and the Integration of Machine Learning into Medical Practice

Author:

Grote Thomas1,Berens Philipp1

Affiliation:

1. University of Tübingen , Tübingen , Germany

Abstract

AbstractIn light of recent advances in machine learning for medical applications, the automation of medical diagnostics is imminent. That said, before machine learning algorithms find their way into clinical practice, various problems at the epistemic level need to be overcome. In this paper, we discuss different sources of uncertainty arising for clinicians trying to evaluate the trustworthiness of algorithmic evidence when making diagnostic judgments. Thereby, we examine many of the limitations of current machine learning algorithms (with deep learning in particular) and highlight their relevance for medical diagnostics. Among the problems we inspect are the theoretical foundations of deep learning (which are not yet adequately understood), the opacity of algorithmic decisions, and the vulnerabilities of machine learning models, as well as concerns regarding the quality of medical data used to train the models. Building on this, we discuss different desiderata for an uncertainty amelioration strategy that ensures that the integration of machine learning into clinical settings proves to be medically beneficial in a meaningful way.

Funder

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Cluster of Excellence “Machine Learning—New Perspectives for Science”, EXC 2064

Federal Ministry of Education and Research

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Philosophy,General Medicine,Issues, ethics and legal aspects

Reference68 articles.

1. Sanity checks for saliency maps;Adebayo;Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2018),2018

2. Expert-validated estimation of diagnostic uncertainty for deep neural networks in diabetic retinopathy detection;Ayhan;Medical Image Analysis,2020

3. The need for uncertainty quantification in machine-assisted medical decision-making;Begoli;Nature Machine Intelligence,2019

4. Reconciling modern machine-learning practice and the classical bias–variance trade-off;Belkin;Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,2019

5. Artificial intelligence and patient-centered decision-making;Bjerring;Philosophy & Technology,2020

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3