Abstract
Abstract
Reputation scholars have convincingly demonstrated the relevance of understanding the behavior of government agencies as motivated by reputational concerns. Yet we must still expand our understanding of how agency audiences pass reputational judgments. Combining insights from bureaucratic reputation theory with psychological theories (motivated reasoning and attribution theory), this article theorizes and tests whether agencies’ reputational histories increase the likelihood of receiving positive or negative newspaper coverage. Our findings are based on an extensive coding of 11,041 newspaper articles over a 10-year period in Denmark and Flanders (Belgium) regarding 40 agencies. We introduce a measure of reputational history from communication studies. The analysis identifies that both negative and positive reputational histories are related to the valence of newspaper coverage, suggesting that the past reputations of agencies are part of the cognitive basis upon which audiences form reputational judgment.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Marketing,Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science
Reference84 articles.
1. Compensating for poor performance with promotional symbols: Evidence from a survey experiment;Alon-Barkat;Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,2017
2. Interpreting performance information: Motivated reasoning or unbiased comprehension;Baekgaard;Public Administration Review,2016
3. The role of evidence in politics: Motivated reasoning and persuasion among politicians;Baekgaard;British Journal of Political Science,2017
4. Citizens’ motivated reasoning about public performance: Experimental findings from the US and Denmark;Bækgaard;International Public Management Journal,2019
5. “They are underpaid and understaffed”: How clients interpret encounters with street-level bureaucrats;Barnes;Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,2018
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献