Affiliation:
1. Roskilde University Department of People and Technology, , Roskilde, Denmark
Abstract
Abstract
Robotic vacuum cleaners are a prime example of home automation and a rich source of information about how people experience it. On the basis of a 3-week diary study, this article compares householders’ user experience (UX) of robotic vacuum cleaners with their UX of three types of manual vacuum cleaner. The main finding is that robotic vacuum cleaners are inferior in use, yet transform vacuuming. While their inferiority is about their pragmatic qualities, their transformative power relates to their autonomy, agency and hedonic qualities. This contradictory UX involves that robotic vacuum cleaners perform worse or not at all on seven out of nine surfaces and, at the same time, appear to escalate cleanliness standards. The transformation of household chores such as vacuuming is ongoing and calls for further research on engineering and merging the pragmatic and hedonic aspects of UX.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Reference51 articles.
1. Electronic monitoring at work: the role of attitudes, functions, and perceived control for the acceptance of tracking technologies;Abraham;Hum. Resour. Manag. J.,2019
2. Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots;Bartneck;Int. J. Soc. Robot.,2009
3. Assessing long-term user experience on a mobile health application through an in-app embedded conversation-based questionnaire;Biduski;Comput. Hum. Behav.,2020
4. Experience design vs. interface design;Buxton;Rotman Magazine,2005
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. 3D Printed Differential Drive Robot with LiDAR and 3D Depth Camera;2024 9th International Conference on Control and Robotics Engineering (ICCRE);2024-05-10