Network activated frames: content sharing and perceived polarization in social media

Author:

Arugute Natalia1,Calvo Ernesto2,Ventura Tiago3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Universidad Nacional de Quilmes , UNQ

2. Government and Politics, University of Maryland , UMD

3. Center for Social Media and Politics, New York University , USA

Abstract

Abstract Our article describes how users’ decisions to share content alter the frequencies of the frame elements observed by social media peers. Changes in the frequency of distinct frame elements shape how individuals interpret, classify and define situations and events. We label this process Network Activated Frames (NAFs). We test the mechanisms behind NAF with an original image-based conjoint design that replicates network activation in three surveys. Results show that partisans share more content than nonpartisans and that their preferences differ from those of nonpartisans. Our findings show that a network of peers with cross-cutting ideological preferences may be perceived as a bubble if partisans amplify content they like at higher rates. Beginning with fully randomized probabilities, the output from our experiments is more extreme than the preferences of the median users, as partisans activate more and different frame elements than nonpartisans. We implement the experiments in Argentina, Brazil, and Mexico.

Funder

Inter-American Development Bank

Transparency, Trust, and Social Media

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics,Communication

Reference56 articles.

1. Is polarization a myth?;Abramowitz;The Journal of Politics,2008

2. Friendship paradox biases perceptions in directed networks;Alipourfard;Nature Communications,2020

3. Time to #Protest: Selective exposure, cascading activation, and framing in social media;Aruguete;Journal of Communication,2018

4. News by popular demand: Ideological congruence, issue salience, and media reputation in news sharing;Aruguete;The International Journal of Press/Politics,2021

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3