Friendship paradox biases perceptions in directed networks

Author:

Alipourfard Nazanin,Nettasinghe Buddhika,Abeliuk Andrés,Krishnamurthy Vikram,Lerman Kristina

Abstract

AbstractSocial networks shape perceptions by exposing people to the actions and opinions of their peers. However, the perceived popularity of a trait or an opinion may be very different from its actual popularity. We attribute this perception bias to friendship paradox and identify conditions under which it appears. We validate the findings empirically using Twitter data. Within posts made by users in our sample, we identify topics that appear more often within users’ social feeds than they do globally among all posts. We also present a polling algorithm that leverages the friendship paradox to obtain a statistically efficient estimate of a topic’s global prevalence from biased individual perceptions. We characterize the polling estimate and validate it through synthetic polling experiments on Twitter data. Our paper elucidates the non-intuitive ways in which the structure of directed networks can distort perceptions and presents approaches to mitigate this bias.

Funder

United States Department of Defense | United States Air Force | AFMC | Air Force Office of Scientific Research

United States Department of Defense | United States Army | U.S. Army Research, Development and Engineering Command | Army Research Office

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Physics and Astronomy,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Chemistry

Cited by 25 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Quantitative Study on the Friendship Paradox in Networks with Power-Law Degree Distribution;Communications in Computer and Information Science;2024

2. The enmity paradox;Scientific Reports;2023-11-16

3. Resampling reduces bias amplification in experimental social networks;Nature Human Behaviour;2023-10-16

4. Social Sampling for Judgments and Predictions of Societal Trends;Sampling in Judgment and Decision Making;2023-06-15

5. Sampling as a Tool in Social Environments;Sampling in Judgment and Decision Making;2023-06-15

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3