Addressing noise in co-expression network construction

Author:

Burns Joshua J R1,Shealy Benjamin T2,Greer Mitchell S3,Hadish John A4,McGowan Matthew T4,Biggs Tyler1,Smith Melissa C2,Feltus F Alex567,Ficklin Stephen P13ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Horticulture, 149 Johnson Hall. Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164. USA

2. Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, 105 Riggs Hall. Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29631. USA

3. School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, EME 102. Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164. USA

4. Molecular Plant Sciences Program, French Ad 324g. Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164. USA

5. Department of Genetics and Biochemistry, 130 McGinty Court. Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634. USA

6. Biomedical Data Science & Informatics Program, 100 McAdams Hall. Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634. USA

7. Clemson Center for Human Genetics, 114 Gregor Mendel Circle, Greenwood, SC 29646. USA

Abstract

Abstract Gene co-expression networks (GCNs) provide multiple benefits to molecular research including hypothesis generation and biomarker discovery. Transcriptome profiles serve as input for GCN construction and are derived from increasingly larger studies with samples across multiple experimental conditions, treatments, time points, genotypes, etc. Such experiments with larger numbers of variables confound discovery of true network edges, exclude edges and inhibit discovery of context (or condition) specific network edges. To demonstrate this problem, a 475-sample dataset is used to show that up to 97% of GCN edges can be misleading because correlations are false or incorrect. False and incorrect correlations can occur when tests are applied without ensuring assumptions are met, and pairwise gene expression may not meet test assumptions if the expression of at least one gene in the pairwise comparison is a function of multiple confounding variables. The ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach to GCN construction is therefore problematic for large, multivariable datasets. Recently, the Knowledge Independent Network Construction toolkit has been used in multiple studies to provide a dynamic approach to GCN construction that ensures statistical tests meet assumptions and confounding variables are addressed. Additionally, it can associate experimental context for each edge of the network resulting in context-specific GCNs (csGCNs). To help researchers recognize such challenges in GCN construction, and the creation of csGCNs, we provide a review of the workflow.

Funder

US National Science Foundation

USDA Hatch Project

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Molecular Biology,Information Systems

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3