Affiliation:
1. Durham University , UK
Abstract
Abstract
This article builds upon existing scholarship concerning the relationship between improvisation and composition. Sections 1 to 3 comprise an exploration into and analysis of both the traditional understanding of improvisation and composition as opposing categories, as well as the more modern, nuanced view of their interpenetrating natures. I conclude that the former view should be replaced by the latter. Sections 4 and 5 present and subsequently negate two potential failings of my argument. First, I confront the problem posed by Goehr’s work-concept, whose essence is opposed to the spirit of improvisation, but argue that recording allows for the solidification of these improvisations into works. Secondly, I undermine the view that composition is creation ex nihilo whilst improvisation is the mere reworking of old material. I uncover the originality of improvisation and formulae of composition to restore their compatibility and reinforce improvisation’s status as a method of broad- and narrow-sense composition.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Reference30 articles.
1. The Improvisation of Musical Dialogue
2. ‘Paganini does not repeat, musical improvisation and the type/token ontology’;Bertinetto;Teorema: Revista Internacional de Filosofía,2012
3. Musical ontology: a view through improvisation’;Bertinetto;Comparative studies in modernism,2013
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Improvisational mistakes;British Journal of Aesthetics;2023-10-23