The systemic approach as an instrument to evaluate higher education systems: Opportunities and challenges

Author:

Aparicio Juan1,Rodríguez Dorys Yaneth2,Zabala-Iturriagagoitia Jon Mikel234ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Centre of Operational Research, Miguel Hernández University of Elche, Avda. de la Universidad, s/n, Elche 03202, Spain

2. Deusto Business School, University of Deusto, Camino de Mundaiz 50, Donostia-San Sebastián 20012, Spain

3. USN School of Business, South Eastern University Norway, Kongsberg 3616, Norway

4. CIRCLE, Lund University, Lund 22362, Sweden

Abstract

Abstract This article aims to provide a systemic instrument to evaluate the functioning of higher education systems. Despite systemic instruments have had a strong impact on the management of public policy systems in fields such as health and innovation, higher education has not been widely discussed in applying this type of instrument. Herein lies the main gap that we want to close. The ultimate purpose of the evaluation instrument introduced here is thus to provide information for decision-makers, so these can identify the strengths/weaknesses in the functioning of their respective higher education systems from a systemic perspective. To achieve the previous goal, we apply the methodological guidelines of the integrative review of the literature. An integrative review of the literature was chosen because it guides the extraction of quantitative evidence from the literature and its classification, with the purpose of integrating the results into an analytical framework. This resulting analytical framework is what we have labelled as the systemic evaluation instrument. The article makes three contributions to the literature. First, the different types of higher education institutions considered in the literature and the higher education systems analysis scales are evidenced. Second, we identify the capacities and functions examined by the literature so that higher education institutions and higher education systems can fulfil their missions. Third, a systemic evaluation framework for higher education institutions and higher education systems is presented. The article concludes with a discussion of the opportunities and challenges associated to the implementation of such a systemic framework for policymaking.

Funder

Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation

State Research Agency

European Regional Development Fund

Basque Government Department of Education, Language Policy and Culture

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Education

Reference72 articles.

1. Benchmarking Universities’ Efficiency Indicators in the Presence of Internal Heterogeneity;Agasisti;Studies in Higher Education,2014

2. Efficiency, Costs, Rankings and Heterogeneity: The Case of US Higher Education;Agasisti;Studies in Higher Education,2015

3. Evaluating Research and Innovation Policy: A Systems World Needs Systems Evaluations;Arnold;Research Evaluation,2004

4. One Size Does Not Fit All! New Perspectives on the University in the Social Knowledge Economy;Benneworth;Science and Public Policy,2016

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3