Affiliation:
1. Department of Communication University of Copenhagen Karen Blixens Plads 8 , 2300 Copenhagen , Denmark
Abstract
Abstract
Recent years have seen an upsurge of interest in the second-person perspective, not only in philosophy of mind, language, law and ethics, but also in various empirical disciplines such as cognitive neuroscience and developmental psychology. A distinctive and perhaps also slightly puzzling feature of this ongoing discussion is that whereas many contributors insist that a proper consideration of the second-person perspective will have an impact on our understanding of social cognition, joint action, communication, self-consciousness, morality, and so on, there remains considerable disagreement about what exactly a second-person perspective amounts to (see Eilan 2014; Conant and Rödl 2014). What is the difference between adopting a second-person and a third-person perspective on another? How does one relate to another as a you and how does that differ from relating to another as a he, she or they? In the following, I will consider three different proposals and argue that a promising but somewhat overlooked account can be found in the work of Husserl.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Reference58 articles.
1. ‘Dialogue in the Making: Emotional Engagement with Materials’;Brinck;Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences,2020
2. ‘Introduction’;Conant;Philosophical Topics,2014
Cited by
19 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Collaborative Inhibition: A Phenomenological Perspective;Review of Philosophy and Psychology;2024-08-05
2. Perceiving Together;Phenomenology and the Norms of Perception;2024-06-20
3. Perceiving Others;Phenomenology and the Norms of Perception;2024-06-20
4. Multisensory Perception;Phenomenology and the Norms of Perception;2024-06-20
5. Bodily Self-Awareness and Agency;Phenomenology and the Norms of Perception;2024-06-20