Collaborative Inhibition: A Phenomenological Perspective

Author:

Gyollai DanielORCID

Abstract

AbstractThe tendency for people to remember less as members of a group than they would be capable of were they to remember alone is a phenomenon known as collaborative inhibition. The article offers a phenomenological account of this highly counterintuitive effect of group remembering. It argues that the mutual failure to live up to one’s potential does not warrant the standard, strongly negative views about the role of others in recall. Rather, the phenomenon may imply that sharedness itself becomes constitutive of the process in the sense that interaction partners co-determine what and how to remember. Drawing on phenomenological approaches to remembering and second-person engagement, the article argues that individuals participating in shared remembering co-construct their memories by reciprocally and dynamically incorporating each other’s perspectives, attitudes, and emotions about their shared past.

Funder

Copenhagen University

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference88 articles.

1. Anderson, M. C., R. A. Bjork, and E. L. Bjork. 1994. Remembering can cause forgetting: Retrieval dynamics in Long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 20(5): 1063–1087.

2. Barber, S. J., C. B. Harris, and S. Rajaram. 2015. Why two heads apart are better than two heads together: Multiple mechanisms underlie the collaborative inhibition effect in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 41: 559–566.

3. Barnier, A. J., J. Sutton, C. B. Harris, and R. A. Wilson. 2008. A conceptual and empirical framework for the social distribution of cognition: The case of memory. Cognitive Systems Research 9(1–2): 33–51.

4. Barnier, A. J., C. B. Harris, T. Morris, and G. Savage. 2018. Collaborative facilitation in older couples: Successful joint remembering across memory tasks. Frontiers in Psychology 9: 2385.

5. Basden, B. H., D. R. Basden, S. Bryner, and R. L. Thomas. 1997. A comparison of group and individual remembering: Does collaboration disrupt retrieval strategies? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 23: 1176–1189.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3