Predictors of self-reported research engagement and academic-career interest amongst medical students in the United Kingdom: a national cross-sectional survey

Author:

Adeboye William1ORCID,Osunronbi Temidayo1ORCID,Faluyi David1,Abankwa Efua1,Abraha Semhar1,Adamu-Biu Fatima1,Ahmad Zain1,Akhionbare Izieduwa1,Chimba Chimba1,Corriero Anna C1,Ibeanusi Ikenna1,Inyang Deborah1,Jones Robert1,Madume Rachael1,Mberu Valentine1,Mitoko Christine A1,Nelson-Rowe Ellen1,O’Riordan Marguerite1,Shoker Serena1,Sofela Agbolahan2,

Affiliation:

1. Melanin Medics Research Network , Luton, LU4 8DY , United Kingdom

2. University of Plymouth Faculty of Health, , Plymouth, PL6 8BT , United Kingdom

Abstract

Abstract Background We hypothesised that the gender/ethnic disparities and reductions in the UK academic-clinician workforce stem from research experience in medical school. This study investigated the factors influencing research engagement and academic-career interests among UK medical students. Methods Using a 42-item online questionnaire, a national multicentre cross-sectional survey of UK medical students was conducted over 9 weeks in the 2020/21 academic year. Multiple binary logistic and zero-inflated negative binomial regressions were used to evaluate associations between the predictor variables and research engagement (yes/no), number of research projects conducted, and academic-career interest (yes/no). P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results In total, 1573 students participated from 36 medical schools. No ethnic/gender differences in research engagement were observed. However, compared to men, women had a 31% decrease in the odds of being interested in an academic-clinician career [odds ratio (OR): 0.69; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.52, 0.92]. Positive predictors of interest in academia were being a PubMed-indexed author (OR: 2.19; 95% CI: 1.38, 3.47) and having at least one national/international presentation (OR: 1.40; 95% CI: 1.04, 1.88). Career progression was the primary motivating factor (67.1%) for pursuing research, whereas limited awareness of opportunities (68.0%) and time constraints (67.5%) were the most common barriers. Conclusion There were no ethnic differences in research engagement or academic-career intent. Although there were no gender differences in research engagement, female students were less likely to be interested in an academic career. This could be tackled by providing targeted opportunities to increase research productivity and self-efficacy in medical schools. Key messages: What is already known on this topic: There has been a decline in the number of academic clinicians, with a disproportionate gender and ethnic representation in the academic workforce. Engaging medical students in research activities during their medical training could mitigate the declining number of academic clinicians. Differential attainment occurs in medical school and persists after graduation. What this study adds: Although there were no gender/ethnic differences in research engagement amongst UK medical students, our study suggests that female students were less likely to be interested in pursuing an academic career. Time constraints, a lack of awareness of opportunities, and difficulty in finding research supervisors/mentors were the most common barriers to research engagement, whereas PubMed-indexed authorship was the strongest positive predictor of interest in an academic career. How this study might affect research, practice, or policy: Medical schools should facilitate the selection of good-quality research mentors that would provide adequate support to ensure that their students’ works are published in peer-reviewed journals. Medical schools should employ local research officers to increase students’ awareness of research opportunities.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

General Medicine

Reference30 articles.

1. Resident scholarship expectations and experiences: sources of uncertainty as barriers to success;Ledford;J Grad Med Educ,2013

2. The student-authored biomedical publications at Alfaisal University, Saudi Arabia: a 6-year descriptive analysis;Alnajjar;Springerplus,2015

3. Research for all? An analysis of clinical participation in research;Royal College of Physicians,2020

4. Survey of medical clinical academic staffing levels 2018;Medical Schools Council,2018

5. Ethnicity and academic performance in UK trained doctors and medical students: systematic review and meta-analysis;Woolf;BMJ,2011

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3