Acceptability of older patients’ self-assessment in the Emergency Department (ACCEPTED)—a randomised cross-over pilot trial

Author:

Boucher Valérie12345,Lamontagne Marie-Eve456,Lee Jacques78,Carmichael Pierre-Hugues5,Déry Julien456,Émond Marcel12345

Affiliation:

1. Centre de recherche sur les soins et les services de première ligne de l’Université Laval (CERSSPL-UL)

2. Centre intégré universitaire de santé et services sociaux (CIUSSS) de la Capitale-Nationale

3. Axe Santé des populations et pratiques optimales en santé, Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec, Québec, Canada

4. Faculté de médecine, Université Laval, Québec, Canada

5. Centre d’excellence sur le vieillissement de Québec, Québec, Canada

6. Centre interdisciplinaire de recherche en réadaptation et intégration sociale, Québec, Canada

7. Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

8. Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Toronto, Canada

Abstract

Abstract Background patient self-assessment using electronic tablet could improve the quality of assessment of older Emergency Department(ED) patients. However, the acceptability of this practice remains unknown. Objective to compare the acceptability of self-assessment using a tablet in the ED to a standard assessment by a research assistant (RA), according to seniors and their caregivers. Design randomised crossover pilot study. Setting The Hôpital de l’Enfant-Jésus (CHU de Québec–Université Laval) (2018/05–2018/07). Subjects (1) ED patients aged ≥65, (2) their caregiver, if present. Methods participants’ frailty, cognitive and functional status were assessed with the Clinical Frailty scale, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, and Older American Resources and Services scale and patients self-assessed using a tablet. Test administration order was randomised. The primary outcome, acceptability, was measured using the Treatment Acceptability and Preferences (TAP) scale. Descriptive analyses were performed for sociodemographic variables. TAP scores were adjusted using multivariate linear regression. Thematic content analysis was performed for qualitative data. Results sixty-seven patients were included. Mean age was 75.5 ± 8.0 and 55.2% were women. Adjusted TAP scores for RA evaluation and patient self-assessment were 2.36 and 2.20, respectively (P = 0.08). Patients aged ≥85 showed a difference between the TAP scores (P < 0.05). Qualitative data indicates that this might be attributed to the use of technology. Data from nine caregivers showed a 2.42 mean TAP score for RA evaluation and 2.44 for self-assessment. Conclusions our results show that older patients believe self-assessment in the ED using an electronic tablet as acceptable as a standard evaluation by a research assistant. Patients aged ≥85 find this practice less acceptable.

Funder

Fondation du CHU de Québec – Université Laval

Faculté de médecine de l’Université Laval

Fonds de Recherche en Santé du Québec / SRAP

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Geriatrics and Gerontology,Aging,General Medicine

Reference33 articles.

1. National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2002 emergency department summary;McCaig;Adv Data,2004

2. Identification of seniors at risk (ISAR) screening tool in the emergency department: implementation using the plan-do-study-act model and validation results;Asomaning;J Emerg Nurs,2014

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3