Author:
Testa Luke,Richardson Lieke,Cheek Colleen,Hensel Theresa,Austin Elizabeth,Safi Mariam,Ransolin Natália,Carrigan Ann,Long Janet,Hutchinson Karen,Goirand Magali,Bierbaum Mia,Bleckly Felicity,Hibbert Peter,Churruca Kate,Clay-Williams Robyn
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The aim of this systematic review was to examine the relationship between strategies to improve care delivery for older adults in ED and evaluation measures of patient outcomes, patient experience, staff experience, and system performance.
Methods
A systematic review of English language studies published since inception to December 2022, available from CINAHL, Embase, Medline, and Scopus was conducted. Studies were reviewed by pairs of independent reviewers and included if they met the following criteria: participant mean age of ≥ 65 years; ED setting or directly influenced provision of care in the ED; reported on improvement interventions and strategies; reported patient outcomes, patient experience, staff experience, or system performance. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed by pairs of independent reviewers using The Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools. Data were synthesised using a hermeneutic approach.
Results
Seventy-six studies were included in the review, incorporating strategies for comprehensive assessment and multi-faceted care (n = 32), targeted care such as management of falls risk, functional decline, or pain management (n = 27), medication safety (n = 5), and trauma care (n = 12). We found a misalignment between comprehensive care delivered in ED for older adults and ED performance measures oriented to rapid assessment and referral. Eight (10.4%) studies reported patient experience and five (6.5%) reported staff experience.
Conclusion
It is crucial that future strategies to improve care delivery in ED align the needs of older adults with the purpose of the ED system to ensure sustainable improvement effort and critical functioning of the ED as an interdependent component of the health system. Staff and patient input at the design stage may advance prioritisation of higher-impact interventions aligned with the pace of change and illuminate experience measures. More consistent reporting of interventions would inform important contextual factors and allow for replication.
Funder
Australian Government Medical Research Future Fund
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference116 articles.
1. United Nations; Department of Economic and Social Affairs; Population Division. World Population Prospects 2022: Summary of Results. UN DESA/POP/2022/TR/NO. 3. New York: United Nations; 2022.
2. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Emergency department care. Available from: https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports-data/myhospitals/sectors/emergency-department-care. [Cited 30 March 2023].
3. Lowthian J, Curtis A, Stoelwinder J, McNeil J, Cameron P. Emergency demand and repeat attendances by older patients. Intern Med J. 2013;43(5):554–60.
4. Samaras N, Chevalley T, Samaras D, Gold G. Older patients in the emergency department: a review. Ann Emerg Med. 2010;56(3):261–9.
5. McIntyre A, Janzen S, Shepherd L, Kerr M, Booth R. An integrative review of adult patient-reported reasons for non-urgent use of the emergency department. BMC Nurs. 2023;22(1):85.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献