Affiliation:
1. University of Oxford , UK
2. All Souls College , Oxford , UK
Abstract
Abstract
Why are railways mostly in the public sector? Interest rates define a time limit for markets. Projects with longer break-evens cannot be funded by business alone. Corporate ‘franchise’ arrangements overcome the limit by means of revenue guarantees which transfer risks to government. Innovations originate bottom-up in private enterprise. Positive externalities create demand for universal provision but scaling up cannot be financed commercially. In the British railway manias of the 1830s, 1840s, and 1860s speculative fever overwhelmed prudence. Overinvestment left an excessive infrastructure legacy and wiped out windfall profits. In other countries railways required external support. Expanding access gave rise to stand-offs with investors which ended up in government regulation or takeover. The tramway boom of 1870–1914 followed this pattern, initially with horse power and then electricity. In the UK railway privatization of the 1990s, the free market delusion was confounded by the infrastructure requirement for long-term commitment.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Economics and Econometrics
Reference110 articles.
1. ‘Top Wealth Shares in the UK Over More than a Century’;Alvaredo;Journal of Public Economics,2018
2. ‘Rates of Return, Concentration Levels and Strategic Change: British Railways from 1830 to 1912’,;Arnold;Journal of Transport History,2005
3. ‘Uncertainty and the Evaluation of Public Investment Decisions’;Arrow;American Economic Review,1970
4. ‘In Tumultuous Year, Con Ed Basks in its Quiet Success’,;Bannerjee;New York Times,,2001
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献