A novel eye-movement impairment in multiple sclerosis indicating widespread cortical damage

Author:

Nij Bijvank Jenny A12ORCID,Hof Sam N1,Prouskas Stefanos E3,Schoonheim Menno M3ORCID,Uitdehaag Bernard M J1,van Rijn Laurentius J24,Petzold Axel125ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Amsterdam UMC, Department of Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, MS Centre and Neuro-ophthalmology Expertise Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience , 1081 HZ Amsterdam , The Netherlands

2. Amsterdam UMC, Department of Ophthalmology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Neuro-ophthalmology Expertise Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience , 1081 HZ Amsterdam , The Netherlands

3. Amsterdam UMC, Department of Anatomy and Neurosciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, MS Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience , 1081 HZ Amsterdam , The Netherlands

4. Department of Ophthalmology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis , 1091 AC Amsterdam , The Netherlands

5. Moorfields Eye Hospital, The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery and the Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL , London EC1V 2PD , UK

Abstract

AbstractIn multiple sclerosis, remyelination trials have yet to deliver success like that achieved for relapse rates with disease course modifying treatment trials. The challenge is to have a clinical, functional outcome measure. Currently, there are none that have been validated, other than visual evoked potentials in optic neuritis. Like vision, quick eye movements (saccades) are heavily dependent on myelination. We proposed that it is possible to extrapolate from demyelination of the medial longitudinal fasciculus in the brainstem to quantitative assessment of cortical networks governing saccadic eye movements in multiple sclerosis.We have developed and validated a double-step saccadic test, which consists of a pair of eye movements towards two stimuli presented in quick succession (the demonstrate eye movement networks with saccades protocol). In this single-centre, cross-sectional cohort study we interrogated the structural and functional relationships of double-step saccades in multiple sclerosis. Data were collected for double-step saccades, cognitive function (extended Rao’s Brief Repeatable Battery), disability (Expanded Disability Status Scale) and visual functioning in daily life (National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire). MRI was used to quantify grey matter atrophy and multiple sclerosis lesion load. Multivariable linear regression models were used for analysis of the relationships between double-step saccades and clinical and MRI metrics. We included 209 individuals with multiple sclerosis (mean age 54.3 ± 10.5 years, 58% female, 63% relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis) and 60 healthy control subjects (mean age 52.1 ± 9.2 years, 53% female).The proportion of correct double-step saccades was significantly reduced in multiple sclerosis (mean 0.29 ± 0.22) compared to controls (0.45 ± 0.22, P < 0.001). Consistent with this, there was a significantly larger double-step dysmetric saccadic error in multiple sclerosis (mean vertical error −1.18 ± 1.20°) compared to controls (−0.54 ± 0.86°, P < 0.001). Impaired double-step saccadic metrics were consistently associated with more severe global and local grey matter atrophy (correct responses—cortical grey matter: β = 0.42, P < 0.001), lesion load (vertical error: β = −0.28, P < 0.001), progressive phenotypes, more severe physical and cognitive impairment (correct responses—information processing: β = 0.46, P < 0.001) and visual functioning. In conclusion, double-step saccades represent a robust metric that revealed a novel eye-movement impairment in individuals with multiple sclerosis. Double-step saccades outperformed other saccadic tasks in their statistical relationship with clinical, cognitive and visual functioning, as well as global and local grey matter atrophy. Double-step saccades should be evaluated longitudinally and tested as a potential novel outcome measure for remyelination trials in multiple sclerosis.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Neurology (clinical)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3