Classifying Anal Intraepithelial Neoplasia 2 Based on LAST Recommendations

Author:

Liu Yuxin1,McCluggage W Glenn2,Darragh Teresa M3,Zheng Wenxin4,Roberts Jennifer M5,Park Kay J6,Hui Pei7,Blakely Morgan8,Sigel Keith9,Gaisa Michael M10

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pathology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY

2. Department of Pathology, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK

3. Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco

4. Department of Pathology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas

5. Histopathology and Cytology Departments, Douglass Hanly Moir Pathology, Sydney, Australia

6. Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

7. Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT

8. Department of Pathology, University of California, Los Angeles

9. Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY

10. Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY

Abstract

Abstract Objectives: The Lower Anogenital Squamous Terminology (LAST) recommendations classify human papillomavirus–associated squamous lesions into low- and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSILs/HSILs). Our study aimed to assess interobserver agreement among 6 experienced pathologists in assigning 40 anal lesions previously diagnosed as anal intraepithelial neoplasia 2 (AIN 2) to either HSIL or non-HSIL categories. Methods: Agreement based on photomicrographs of H&E alone or H&E plus p16 immunohistochemistry was calculated using κ coefficients. Results: Agreement was fair based on H&E alone (κ = 0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.34-0.52). Adding p16 improved agreement to moderate (κ = 0.55; 95% CI, 0.54-0.62). On final diagnosis, 21 cases (53%) had unanimous diagnoses, and 19 (47%) were divided. When designating p16 results as positive or negative, agreement was excellent (κ = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.83-0.95). Among variables (staining location, extent, and intensity), staining of the basal/parabasal layers was a consistent feature in cases with consensus for positive results (20/20). Of the 67 H&E diagnoses with conflicting p16 results, participants modified 32 (48%), downgrading 23 HSILs and upgrading 9 non-HSILs. Conclusions: Although p16 increased interobserver agreement, disagreement remained considerable regarding intermediate lesions. p16 expression, particularly if negative, can reduce unwarranted HSIL diagnoses and unnecessary treatment.

Funder

National Institutes of Health

National Cancer Institute

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3