Affiliation:
1. Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital , Boston, MA , US
2. Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute , Boston, MA , US
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
Targeted therapies for blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN) have presented a diagnostic dilemma for differentiating residual BPDCN from reactive plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) because these conditions have a similar immunoprofile, necessitating discovery of additional diagnostic markers.
Methods
Fifty cases of BPDCN involving bone marrow (26/50) and skin (24/50) as well as other hematologic malignancies (67) and nonneoplastic samples (37) were included. Slides were stained using a double-staining protocol for the following immunohistochemical marker combinations: TCF4/CD123, TCF4/CD56, SOX4/CD123, and IRF8/CD123.
Results
The nuclear marker SOX4 is expressed in neoplastic pDCs; in our cohort, SOX4/CD123 showed 100% sensitivity and 98% specificity in distinguishing BPDCN from reactive pDCs and other neoplasms. TCF4/CD56 had a 96% sensitivity and 100% specificity for BPDCN. IRF8 is a nonspecific marker that is positive in BPDCN and pDCs as well as other myeloid malignancies.
Conclusions
The novel immunohistochemical combination SOX4/CD123 distinguishes BPDCN, including CD56-negative BPDCN, from both reactive pDCs and other neoplasms. Because of their high diagnostic sensitivity and specificity, the double-staining marker combinations TCF4/CD123, TCF4/CD56, and SOX4/CD123 can be used to confirm lineage in BPDCN cases and detect minimal/measurable residual disease in tissue specimens.
Funder
AbbVie
QIAGEN
Leukemia and Lymphoma Society
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献