How to optimally constrain galaxy assembly bias: supplement projected correlation functions with count-in-cells statistics

Author:

Wang Kuan12ORCID,Mao Yao-Yuan12ORCID,Zentner Andrew R12ORCID,van den Bosch Frank C3ORCID,Lange Johannes U3ORCID,Schafer Chad M45,Villarreal Antonio S16,Hearin Andrew P6,Campbell Duncan57ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA

2. Pittsburgh Particle Physics, Astrophysics, and Cosmology Center (PITT PACC), University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA

3. Department of Astronomy, Yale University, PO Box 208101, New Haven, CT 06511, USA

4. Department of Statistics & Data Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA

5. McWilliams Center for Cosmology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA

6. Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60539, USA

7. Department of Physics, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA

Abstract

ABSTRACT Most models for the statistical connection between galaxies and their haloes ignore the possibility that galaxy properties may be correlated with halo properties other than halo mass, a phenomenon known as galaxy assembly bias. And yet, it is known that such correlations can lead to systematic errors in the interpretation of survey data that are analysed using traditional halo occupation models. At present, the degree to which galaxy assembly bias may be present in the real Universe, and the best strategies for constraining it remain uncertain. We study the ability of several observables to constrain galaxy assembly bias from redshift survey data using the decorated halo occupation distribution (dHOD), an empirical model of the galaxy–halo connection that incorporates assembly bias. We cover an expansive set of observables, including the projected two-point correlation function wp(rp), the galaxy–galaxy lensing signal ΔΣ(rp), the void probability function VPF(r), the distributions of counts-in-cylinders P(NCIC), and counts-in-annuli P(NCIA), and the distribution of the ratio of counts in cylinders of different sizes P(N2/N5). We find that despite the frequent use of the combination wp(rp) + ΔΣ(rp) in interpreting galaxy data, the count statistics, P(NCIC) and P(NCIA), are generally more efficient in constraining galaxy assembly bias when combined with wp(rp). Constraints based upon wp(rp) and ΔΣ(rp) share common degeneracy directions in the parameter space, while combinations of wp(rp) with the count statistics are more complementary. Therefore, we strongly suggest that count statistics should be used to complement the canonical observables in future studies of the galaxy–halo connection.

Funder

National Science Foundation

U.S. Department of Energy

Klaus Tschira Foundation

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Canadian Mathematical Society

Division of Mathematical Sciences

University of California

Ames Research Center

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Space and Planetary Science,Astronomy and Astrophysics

Cited by 29 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3