A statistical evaluation of ballistic backmapping for the slow solar wind: The interplay of solar wind acceleration and corotation

Author:

Macneil Allan R1ORCID,Owens Mathew J1ORCID,Finley Adam J2,Matt Sean P3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, Reading, UK

2. Department of Astrophysics-AIM, University of Paris-Saclay and University of Paris, CEA, CNRS, Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex 91191, France

3. Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK

Abstract

Abstract Mapping solar wind plasma back to its source is often achieved using the ‘two-step ballistic backmapping’ method. Solar wind observations are mapped through the heliosphere to the edge of a PFSS model, by assuming a constant speed, radial, plasma flow. Tracing field lines through the model gives the source location at 1 R⊙ The heliospheric mapping component hinges upon the argument that two known sources of error, stemming from solar wind acceleration and non-radial flow, effectively cancel. This assumption has not been tested statistically. In this study, we evaluate the heliospheric portion of two-step backmapping, in addition to mapping using models with explicit radial acceleration, and azimuthal velocity, vφ, derived from angular momentum conservation. We estimate longitudinal mapping offsets, Δφ, between 326 Earth-observed crossings of the heliospheric current sheet (HCS), and corresponding crossings at 2.5 R⊙ from PFSS models. While the detailed solar wind models can be optimised to produce Δφ in good average agreement with HCS crossing data, the ballistic mapping performs almost as well, although all residuals have a sizeable standard deviation σ ∼ 16○. We conclude that the proposed error cancellation likely contributes to the good performance of ballistic mapping. However, interplanetary acceleration and the height of effective solar wind corotation are both smaller than previously assumed. Our results further suggest that early Parker Solar Probe observations of large vφ around 36 R⊙ do not represent the overall solar wind, due to the requirement for it to be balanced by increased acceleration.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Space and Planetary Science,Astronomy and Astrophysics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3