The integrated galaxy-wide stellar initial mass function over the radial acceleration range of early-type galaxies

Author:

Dabringhausen J1ORCID,Kroupa P12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Astronomical Institute , Charles University, V Holešovičkách 2, CZ-180 00 Praha 8 , Czech Republic

2. Helmholtz-Institut für Strahlen- und Kernphysik, Universität Bonn , Nussallee 14-16, D-53115 Bonn , Germany

Abstract

ABSTRACT The observed radial accelerations of 462 early-type galaxies (ETGs) at their half-mass radii are discussed. They are compared to the baryonic masses of the same galaxies, which are derived from theoretical expectations for their stellar populations and cover a range from $\approx 10^4 \, {\rm M}_{\odot }$ to $\approx 10^{11} \, {\rm M}_{\odot }$. Both quantities are plotted against each other, and it is tested whether they lie (within errors) along theoretical radial acceleration relations (RARs). We choose the Newtonian RAR and two Milgromian, or MONDian RARs. At low radial accelerations (corresponding to low masses), the Newtonian RAR fails without non-baryonic dark matter, but the two MONDian ones may work, provided moderate out-of-equilibrium dynamics in some of the low-mass ETGs. However all three RARs fail at high accelerations (corresponding to high masses) if all ETGs have formed their stellar populations with the canonical stellar initial mass function (IMF). A much better agreement with the observations can however be accomplished, if the theory of the integrated galaxy-wide stellar initial mass functions (IGIMFs) is used instead. This is because the IGIMF-theory predicts the formation of an overabundance of stellar remnants during the lifetime of the massive ETGs. Thus their baryonic masses today are higher than they would be if the ETGs had formed with a canonical IMF. Also the masses of the stellar-mass black holes should be rather high, which would mean that most of them probably formed when the massive ETGs were not as metal-enriched as they are today. The IGIMF-approach confirms downsizing.

Funder

Grant Agency of the Czech Republic

NASA

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Space and Planetary Science,Astronomy and Astrophysics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3