Knowledge gaps, lack of confidence, and system barriers to guideline implementation among European physicians managing patients with CIED lead or infection complications: a European Heart Rhythm Association/European Society of Cardiology educational needs assessment survey

Author:

Rao Archana1,Garner Daniel1,Starck Christoph234,Kirkfeldt Rikke Esberg5,Dagres Nikolaos6,Didier Klug7,Montano Nicolas8,Heidbuchel Hein9

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiology, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, L14 3PE UK

2. Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, German Heart Center Berlin, Berlin, Germany

3. Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, German Center of Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), partner site Berlin, Berlin, Germany

4. Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Steinbeis University Berlin, Institute (STI) of Cardiovascular Perfusion, Berlin, Germany

5. Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark

6. Heart Center Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany

7. Department of Cardiology, University of Lille, CHU Lille, F-59000 Lille, France

8. Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, IRCCS Fondazione Ca’ Granda, Ospedale Maggiore di Milano, University of Milan, Milan, Italy

9. Cardiology, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium

Abstract

Abstract As the number of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) grows, they are likely to present with issues to diverse groups of physicians. Guideline-adherent management is associated with improved prognosis in patients with CIED infection or lead problems but is insufficiently implemented in practice. The European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) with the support of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Working Group on Cardiovascular Surgery, performed a multinational educational needs assessment study in ESC member countries, directed at physicians who might be confronted with CIED patients with complications. A total of 336 physicians from 43 countries, reached through the ESC mailing list, participated. They included a mix of electrophysiologists, cardiologists general physicians and cardiac surgeons .One hundred and twenty-nine (38%) of the respondents performed lead extraction. The survey included eight clinical cases and a self-evaluation question of knowledge and skills to apply that knowledge. The survey looked at 14 areas of care across five stages of the patient journey. Of the non-extracting physicians over 50% felt they lacked the knowledge and skills to make the diagnosis and refer for lead extraction and over 75% felt they lacked knowledge and skills to manage aspects of extraction and post-extraction care. Barriers to correct referral were logistic and attitudinal. Extracting physicians reported significantly higher rates of adequate skills and knowledge across all five stages of the patient journey (P < 0.05). We identified major gaps in physicians’ knowledge and skills across all stages of CIED care. These gaps should be addressed by targeted educational activities and streamlining referral pathways.

Funder

Cook Medical and Philips

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3