Relaxation Therapy for Hypertension: Design Effects and Treatment Effects2

Author:

Jacob Rolf G.1,Chesney Margaret A.2,Williams David M.1,Ding Yijun1,Shapiro Alvin P.1

Affiliation:

1. University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine

2. University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine

Abstract

Abstract The outcome literature on relaxation therapy for hypertension is surveyed and compared with the results of a recent meta-analysis, the Hypertension Intervention Pooling Project (HIPP). The results in the literature appear more favorable than those obtained in the HIPP. It seems that different impressions regarding the efficacy of relaxation therapy are reached depending on whether all studies or only methodologically sophisticated studies are examined. Besides pre-treatment pressure, the effect of baseline entry characteristics of a study were found to affect outcome: the largest declines in systolic pressure were reported in studies that included only one baseline session and used patients who were new to the outcome measurement setting. Comparing the changes of blood pressure in response to different treatment modalities yielded few differences once the effects of pre-treatment pressure and baseline entry characteristics had been considered; nevertheless, further research might be indicated to assess the effect of stress- or anxiety-management and EMG-biofeedback-assisted relaxation, using appropriate designs. The possibility of patient characteristics predisposing to successful treatment outcome was considered, but no clear findings are available at this time. A final concern is a possible lack of generalization of the relaxation effect outside of the blood pressure measurement situation; the declines in blood pressure observed with relaxation therapy may be transient and specific for the measurement situation.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,General Psychology

Cited by 48 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3