How Can Pro-regime Online Comments Influence Chinese Netizens’ Attitudes and Opinion Expressions? Normative or Informational Social Influence?

Author:

Pan Yating1ORCID,Shu Zhan2

Affiliation:

1. School of Public Policy and Management, Tsinghua University , Beijing , China

2. School of International Communications, University of Nottingham , Ningbo , China

Abstract

Abstract China, as an authoritarian regime that has tight control over social media, has always sought to manipulate public opinion. In addition to censorship, the state mobilizes undercover paid posters to manufacture a pro-regime opinion environment. In this study, we examine the effectiveness of this adaptation by conducting an online survey experiment. We explore whether pro-regime comments accompanying a news post can effectively affect viewers’ private and expressed thoughts, as well as whether these are driven by normative or informational social influence. The results indicate that pro-regime comments cannot significantly influence individuals’ attitudes in favor of the authorities. Moreover, uniform pro-regime comments can even produce counterproductive effects. However, pro-regime comments do have an impact on individuals’ opinion expressions. Respondents who take dissenting viewpoints tend to avoid expressing themselves when facing a climate of pro-regime opinion. Additionally, the persuasive effects of high-quality pro-regime arguments were found to be better compared to low-quality arguments.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Sociology and Political Science

Reference63 articles.

1. The “nasty effect:” Online incivility and risk perceptions of emerging technologies;Anderson;Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication,2014

2. Influence on the recommendations of internet users: The role of social presence and expertise;Ardelet;Recherche et Applications en Marketing (English Edition),2011

3. Censorship and deletion practices in Chinese social media;Bamman;First Monday,2012

4. Social media monitoring: Responsive governance in the shadow of surveillance?;Bekkers;Government Information Quarterly,2013

5. The polls—Review: Public opinion research and support for the Iraq War;Berinsky;Public Opinion Quarterly,2007

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3